Acumen Fund's common sense model to existence and assessment

by Nathaniel Whittemore · 2008-11-07 11:10:00 UTC
Topics:

Listening to a panel now titled "Next Steps: Leveraging Existing Measurement Tools and Applications," that features Rob Katz of NextBillion.net and the Acumen Fund.

Acumen Fund is a nonprofit social venture capital firm that invests in bottom-of-the-pyramid businesses that serve clients living on less than $4 a day. There own social entrepreneurial model matches the values of the types of businesses they support, and they're absolutely a model and field leader for those of us interested in the emerging blended value space.

It's always informative to listen to people who can clearly explain and articulate their organization and process. Rob explained that three big ideas animate the Acumen Fund's mission:

  1. Charity and aid alone can never solve the problem of global poverty
  2. Market solutions alone can never solve the problem of global poverty
  3. Dignity is more important to the human spirit than is wealth

Pretty clear, huh? Along the same lines, he said that their approach to metrics is that they should be: understandable, inexpensive, and useful.

None of this is to say that Acumen Fund doesn't have complex and thorough processes for vetting the organizations they fund - quite the opposite. But we could all learn something from the clarity and simplicity of the way they articulate their animating idea.

Nathaniel Whittemore is the founder of Assetmap. Previously he was the founding director of the Northwestern University Center for Global Engagement.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Great debates: Mission-specific or cross-cutting data?
NEXT STORY:
Facing Forward: The End of the Social Entrepreneurship Blog on Change.org

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.