An Alternative Argument for Recognizing the Armenian Genocide

by Michelle . · 2010-03-09 11:03:00 UTC
Topics:

Turkey has devoted so much energy -- and money -- to denying the World War I-era Armenian genocide that you'd think their currency was tied to it. Likewise, successive U.S. administrations have spent so much time trying to keep Congress from passing resolutions about the event that it begs the question: All of proper moral and other reasons for recognizing the Armenian genocide aside, why not just do it, suffer whatever short-lived diplomatic temper tantrum Turkey wants to throw at us, and be done with it?

At a time when the Obama administration would likely rather be concentrating on health care or the economy (though certainly not Sudan, it seems, but that's another post), Congress is pushing the president to honor his campaign promise to recognize the genocide, forcing the administration into a corner and leading Turkey to turn the tired old trick of recalling its ambassador. It's deja vu, all over again, with the added intrigue of the campaign promise -- just ask Nancy Pelosi.

If you aren't swayed by the moral imperatives at play here, then consider the political cost-benefit analysis: What would be the cost of taking the moral high ground and putting an end to the matter once and for all, versus allowing it to pop up again and again, whenever seems to be most politically inconvenient? China makes similar threats all the time, warning American presidents not to meet with the Dalai Lama -- but has it ever amounted to anything that lasted longer than a news cycle or two? Does Turkey give us anything we absolutely can't live without? Do we give anything to Turkey that they wouldn't want taken away? Where's the game of hardball, here?

What if, though, Obama has some kind of plan to use his oft-espoused "soft power" approach to foreign policy to eventually coax the recognition out of Turkey, and forcing the issue now screws over any chance of it happening at all -- via bold Congressional resolutions or quiet diplomatic nudging? ("What if" being the operative words, as Obama's lack of transparency on human rights issues leaves much to be desired.)

Just something to think about.

Photo credit: Chuck Kennedy, President Obama in Istanbul.

Michelle . has been involved in various activist endeavors, including the Teach Against Genocide pilot campaigns.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Truth and Justice for Victims of Colombian Paramilitaries?
NEXT STORY:
Campaign about Apple Factories in China Gains Wide and Diverse Support

COMMENTS (4)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.