Animal Abuser Registries and Redemption

by Stephanie Feldstein · 2010-02-22 14:00:00 UTC
Topics:

The Animal Legal  Defense Fund has launched a new program to help states create public registries for animal abusers. The registries would protect animals and communities by preventing repeat offenses from anyone convicted of felony animal abuse. The first-ever bill for a statewide registry was announced today in California.

As someone who is involved in animal rescue and adoption, I would love to have the security of knowing whether potential adopters have a history of abuse. If my new neighbor had previously killed his neighbor's dog, I'd want to know that, too. But do animal abuser registries mean that we've given up on rehabilitation and redemption?

There are no forms of animal abuse that can be shrugged off as a technicality. Since animals can't speak out against their abusers, convictions rely on empirical evidence like injuries or malnourishment. The evidence needs to be solid enough that there's little question that the animal's condition could have occurred for any other reason.

The maximum penalties for animal abuse tend to be so light that they're almost a mockery. Just last week, the man who threw his dog Oreo (of the famed Oreo's Law) from the roof of his six-story building was sentenced to six months probation, a job training treatment program, and is banned from owning animals, but not from being around them. ALDF provides several case studies of horrendous acts of animal abuse and the repeated cruelty that followed short sentences.

It's the frequency of repeat offenses that makes the case for registries even stronger. Hoarders are known to relapse almost without fail. Animal abuse is strongly linked to domestic violence and other sociopathic behaviors. Dog fights are known hotbeds criminal activity, with drugs and weapons almost as prevalent as the dogs.

These registries can be an important tool in preventing animal abuse. But legislators need to make sure they're established in a way that helps enforcement instead of stretching the already-thin resources dedicated to animal control and cruelty investigations. They can't take the place of strengthening animal cruelty laws.

Legislators also need to avoid the temptation of getting overzealous in what types of crimes are included. This has been the pitfall of other public registries, like those for sex offenders, which are often criticized for including too many offenses, condemning people for life, and making rehabilitation impossible by ostracizing people. If someone is charged with criminal neglect because he didn't understand what his animal needed, he shouldn't just be lumped together with people who have maimed and tortured animals; there should be an attempt at education and rehabilitation. It's too easy for people to obtain animals not to at least try to rehabilitate them.

Public registries can't exist in a bubble, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't exist. To find out more about how getting a registry in your state, visit ALDF's Expose Animal Abusers website.

Photo credit: tillwe

Stephanie Feldstein is a Change.org Editor who has been part of the animal welfare and rescue community for over a decade, and most recently worked for an environmental organization.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Homeless People's Pets Aren't Homeless
NEXT STORY:
Petitions Delivered Around the World for Release of Indonesian Circus Dolphins

COMMENTS (11)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.