Another (Dismally, Comically, Painfully) Bad Week for Joel Klein

by Clay Burell · 2009-04-17 13:13:00 UTC
Topics:

Joel Klein

You've got to wonder if Joel Klein, Mayor Bloomberg, Eli Broad, and the whole billionaire gang are cooking up ways, now that they've largely neutralized NYC parents, to neutralize the interwebs next. The cheeky thing just won't know its place and let Klein have the last (or only) word. It must annoy him, but it may tickle you a good bit. So enjoy

Eine "Kleine" Friday Night Schadenfreude

Read:

1. Diane Ravitch's NYTimes op-ed, "Mayor Bloomberg's Crib Sheet," correcting our affably misinformed (or dammit, is it disinforming?) "Arnie" Duncan's whoppers about Bloomberg/Klein's "NYC miracle" first; then

2. Klein's NYTimes response to Ravitch, "The Chancellor's Report Card"; then

3. Aaron "skoolboy" Pallas at Gotham Schools' cool but deadly analysis of Klein's response to Ravitch, "Why NAEP Matters"; then

4. Ravitch's own delicious and, yes, devastating response to Klein's response on the NYC Public School Parents blog. A teaser:

And then there is the strange idea that NYC kids do well on state tests because they study for them, but do poorly on national tests because they don't. Of what value is it to learn to read if one can read only for state tests? Does that mean that students can't read college textbooks or work manuals because they are prepared only to take state tests?

I read a claim recently, maybe in EdWeek, that everybody with a stake in education funding is afraid to openly criticize Duncan because he holds the purse-strings to the $5 billion in "race to the top" [sic?] funds. I just hope he can read and think about what Ravitch is trying to tell him.

I know this sounds straight from a Liz Smith article, but who says this stuff can't get juicy? Bravo to Ms. Ravitch for the work.

Klein photo by azipaybarah

Clay Burell
PREVIOUS STORY:
More on China and 21st Century Skills
NEXT STORY:
Student loans got you down? Start a petition.

COMMENTS (3)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.