Anti-Gay Money Would Be Better Used Elsewhere

by Adam Amel Rogers · 2010-08-24 16:03:00 UTC

Proposition 8 has been an emotional and an expensive journey. After the appeal process, we will hopefully be right back where we were before the proposition, with gay and lesbian couples enjoying the freedom to marry in California (and beyond). So it makes you think what it would have been like if the proposition never happened.

It almost didn’t.

In 2008, the California Supreme Court had an opportunity to stop Proposition 8 from even making it onto the ballot in the first place. Unfortunately, they unanimously allowed it to continue. Imagine how much heartbreak and money they could have saved by ruling it unconstitutional before it was on the ballot.

Any money spent on anti-gay causes is infuriating. We are in an economy that needs to value each and every dollar. It is astonishing to me that people can still look at their hard-earned personal finances and decide that even one cent is best used by fighting LGBT equality. Think about if Focus on the Family or the Family Research Council actually spent the donated dollar on worthwhile causes. With their monstrous operating budgets they could do some real good in this world.

Lots of money has been spent on the many anti-gay ballot initiatives throughout the years, but they all dwarf in comparison to Proposition 8. Over $73 million was spent between the two sides on the proposition and I can’t help but look at how that money could have been better spent. In my utopian world, the Mormon Church and all of the anti-gay organizations would have teamed up with LGBT equality advocates to try and eradicate a problem in the world. My problem of choice is the California education system.

Education in California (and in many other states) has become a bad reality competition show. Just like having to make an evening look out of grocery store materials on Project Runway or having to compose a gourmet dish from vending machine contents on Top Chef, the California education system is filled with evil twists. Picture Heidi or Padma standing in front of California teachers and telling them they have to teach students how to read, but their salaries will be lowered, their class sizes will be doubled, and they will have no money for supplies or support. Your time starts… Now!

Now $73 million won’t completely solve the funding woes – over $17 billion has been cut from the public education system in California in the past two years, but this money could still save some teacher jobs and help reduce class size back to a somewhat manageable level.

If the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upholds Judge Vaughn Walker’s brilliant ruling that calls Proposition 8 unconstitutional, super lawyers Ted Olson and David Boies are reportedly going to try and recover legal fees from the anti-gay ProtectMarriage.com folks who defended Prop 8.  Perhaps they should take it a step further and demand that those who funded the proposition donate an equal amount to an actual worthwhile cause.

If you were in charge of the $73 million spent on Proposition 8, how would you use the money?

Photo credit: John Stavely

Adam Amel Rogers studies the impact of entertainment on society at the USC Annenberg Norman Lear Center. Previously, he worked at the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Should Judge Walker Have Recused Himself?
NEXT STORY:
Bullied high schooler convinces MPAA to change ‘Bully’ rating to “PG-13”

COMMENTS (6)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.