Appearance and Expectation

by Dora Raymaker · 2009-06-04 10:18:00 UTC
Topics:

a paper collage. the background is a piece of sheet music with colors and flower prints painted over it. in the top left corner a print of a swallow flies toward the lower right corner. at right and center is an old photograph of woman with long braids down to her wrists, wearing a polka dotted dress with a heart sewn into the chest. she is holding flowers in her left hand. there are big bows on the ends of the braids. the date on the photo is probably turn of the 20th centuryPopular culture and television not being within my sphere of Interest, I didn't manage to hear about Susan Boyle until just this week when stories about her hit my disability rights feeds. While most of you (unlike me) probably have known the story since it started, Susan Boyle is a middle aged woman from Scotland who has learning disabilities (hence the disability rights feeds) and also an incredible talent for singing (hence the popular culture). She was on a TV show called "Britain's Got Talent" which is one of those TV shows where people perform and are judged and I assume get some reward if they do well (I learned a bunch about Susan Boyle in the past few days--I still have zero interest in television shows!).

So I watched this video (Susan Boyle's opening performance--embedding is unavailable, you'll have to clicky to go to YouTube).

And I also read this article (an op ed in the New York Times called "Desperately Seeking Susan"), which discusses Susan Boyle, Matthias Buchinger, Thomas Quasthoff, and some similar others--people with exceptional talent who also happened to look pretty different from the mainstream. The meat of the article is how physical appearance, as well as socioeconomic factors, color the expectations that the public has of a person. From that article, "Because of their appearance, both Buchinger and Ms. Boyle were saddled with low expectations. This can work to the performer's advantage: lessened anticipation coupled with high ability can bring on an exponential acceptance."

Watching the audience at the start of the Susan Boyle performance was painful--the snickering, whispering, excluding faces are ones I know all too well. Many mainstream people tend to take delight in making people who aren't like them feel bad, and delight in seeing them fail, a cruel behavior that I am grateful my "social deficit" prevents me from comprehending or engaging in. That audience not only expected Susan Boyle to be a buffoon but wanted her to be.

But she wasn't.

And she isn't.

She's a human being who has a fantastic talent.

If Susan Boyle had looked like a model and acted like a socialite, no one would have been surprised by her talent. They wouldn't have snickered. They would have rooted for her from the start.

What's up with that? Why shouldn't any old arbitrary person, regardless of appearance, have a beautiful signing voice or otherwise be able to do something lovely? What does the low expectation of individuals who simply look or act different do the opportunities we are given and the ways we are treated by others--both before they know we can do something besides act weird and after they discover we have abilities beyond that?

Individuals may say they are not biased against people with disabilities, but large scale social behavior suggests otherwise. If there was no underlying negative bias, then people might expect just as much singing talent from the middle aged woman with learning disabilities as they do from the model who aced finishing school.

My judgement on the performance? Susan Boyle gets an A for her very real talent. Mainstream culture gets an F for disablist attitudes.

PREVIOUS STORY:
"Epidemic," Bettelheim, Science: Simon Baron-Cohen on Autism
NEXT STORY:
Why I'm Asking Aetna to Cover My Surgery

COMMENTS (3)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.