Apple and the Ugly Truth About How Computers Are Made

by Nathaniel Whittemore · 2010-03-01 06:51:00 UTC

Last week, Apple released its Supplier Responsibility 2010 progress report -- an audit of all of the manufacturing production facilities -- and the results aren't pretty. The report found that a too-high percentage of facilities employ child labor or unscrupulous labor practices.

Which leads to some broader questions about what real corporate responsibility looks like, and what we should expect of our products -- and ourselves.

According to a writeup of the report on Engadget, Apple audited 102 factories, and found that 54% had employees that worked more than the maximum allowed 60-hour weeks; 24% were paid less than minimum wage; 37% failed to meet anti-discrimination practices, and three facilities had employed a total of 11 people who were 15 when they started working. In response, Apple seems likely to employ approaches that range from better training to using threats of ending business and more to push manufacturers into compliance.

So what are we supposed to make of this? The Telegraph UK headlined, "Apple admits using child labor," an extremely disingenuous bit of editorializing that masquerades as journalism. The story made it seem as though Apple got caught with its pants down, rather than simply published an audit it had, itself, performed. These issues are far too important for a major global publication to write a defamatory story when, in fact, it's actually incredibly progressive for a major company to voluntarily conduct this sort of audit and then publish the results -- warts and all.

Because the most disturbing part of this whole story is that in the course of the audit, in many factories, Apple found that they were almost always the first Western company to try and perform such an audit. These are the plants where all of our electronics are built, and to hear that companies have no idea about what's going on is pretty disenheartening. I'm glad to laud Apple for doing this audit -- and I'll be even more glad next year to report all their progress.

Still, the larger question has to center on what we expect of our manufacturing processes. Consumer demand for lower prices drives pressure for unscrupulous practices. A huge part of changing the world, then, has to mean voting with our dollars.

Photo Credit: djenan

Nathaniel Whittemore is the founder of Assetmap. Previously he was the founding director of the Northwestern University Center for Global Engagement.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Tech Community Retrofits Haiti Tools For Chile's Earthquake
NEXT STORY:
Facing Forward: The End of the Social Entrepreneurship Blog on Change.org

COMMENTS (2)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.