As Van Jones Leaves, One Less Innovation Advocate in the White House

by Nathaniel Whittemore · 2009-09-06 11:12:00 UTC

It's hard to watch the national political debate these days and wonder whether our parents were wrong to suggest that bullies don't win in the end. The shrill caterwaul of Glen Beckism has claimed its first victim in Van Jones, the so-called Green Jobs czar, author of "The Green Collar Economy," and Echoing Green fellow. This is the sort of cynicism that makes social entrepreneurs turn away from government.

Van Jones is a big radical, according to Fox News host and apparent new king of US media Glen Beck. He's had the gall to call Republicans "assholes;" and as a young person he was in a group sympathetic to Maoists. The big "radical" stamp on his forehead however comes from a petition he signed in 2004 suggesting that there were unanswered questions about what the US government knew in advance of 9/11.

Over the past week, Jones has been subject to the constant onslaught of Beck and his ilk, finally succumbing and removing himself from the conversation by resigning. Change.org Global Warming editor Emily wrote a great post on why this was such a loss.

The political conversation around this is probably a bit beyond the scope of this blog, but I will say this. The issues that we face and that we have to address, not in a few years but right now, and not because they're important but because they're essential to the actual ability of this nation and this planet to survive, cannot be allowed to be reduced to soundbyte madness.

The problem is that the game is no longer about "who controls the narrative." The game being played is actually about the selectivity of facts. As a friend put it "they don't control the tone of the national debate, they create the debate itself around whichever unreality suits them." Doing a search for a photo for this piece I searched "Van Jones," which prompted Google to suggest the related search "Van Jones Communist." Really?

At the end of the day, Van Jones is far less important than the implications. I wrote the other day that social entrepreneurship needs advocates with real political power to rebuild and restructure economies. One person extremely well-positioned to be as close to that as we have is now gone and the question becomes, can this or any administration really be a partner in innovation?

(Photo: Van Jones surrounded by other known radicals like Texas oil billionaire T. Boone Pickens, via Center for American Progress on Flickr)

Nathaniel Whittemore is the founder of Assetmap. Previously he was the founding director of the Northwestern University Center for Global Engagement.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Does Google Have the Right to Digitize the Global Library?
NEXT STORY:
Facing Forward: The End of the Social Entrepreneurship Blog on Change.org

COMMENTS (3)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.