Big Food, Bigger Lies

by Natasha Chart · 2009-04-13 10:55:00 UTC

Rooting piglets; by treehouse1977The food industry is as bad as the tobacco industry for lying about the health effects of their products until good citizens everywhere just throw their hands up in despair of being able to figure out who's right. To wit ...

In a New York Times article that ran this past weekend, perhaps for its sense of dramatic flair, James E. McWilliams said that locavores are ruining food. He used a National Pork Producers Council study that found trichinosis antibodies (but not actual cases of trichinosis) in free range pigs to suggest that pigs allowed to freely forage in grass and root around in leaves pose a serious health risk.

Have you ever heard of a nationwide recall of farmers market pork? Me neither.

In fact, McWillams' proposed alternative, the concentrated animal feeding operations of industrial agriculture are themselves a health hazard to their workers and neighbors. Not only do CAFOs incubate and harbor antibiotic-resistant drug, the stressed and cramped animals that live in their stifling pens have their immune systems constantly battered in every way.

His argument is the equivalent of saying that human beings can be kept healthier when they're crammed 10 to a shack and a 1,000 or more to a toilet, in unplumbed slums where sewage runs freely in garbage-strewn streets. Is there anyone, anywhere, who could be persuaded to buy that bunkum?

Because that's what a CAFO is, a filthy slum for animals. A disgusting place where the manure often piles up in 'lagoons' you could drown in.

I don't know how someone could actively prefer to buy meat from that sort of environment if they had a choice. But then, I don't really understand people who get off on sadomasochistic relationships, either.

(Photo credit: treehouse1977 on Flickr.)

PREVIOUS STORY:
School Lunch Politics Explained, Part 3
NEXT STORY:
Join the Social Media Day of Action to Rid Girl Scout Cookies of Forest-Destroying Palm Oil

COMMENTS (14)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.