Blog Debate Wrap-up

by Timothy Foley · 2009-03-14 20:33:00 UTC
Topics:

All this week, this site hosted a blog debate about what approach we should take on health care reform in 2009.  Dr. Don McCanne, a retired family physician now serving as Senior Health Policy Fellow for Physicians for a National Health Program, represented the "single-payer" point of view and Jason Rosenbaum, a writer and activist, and the Deputy Director of Online Campaigns for Health Care for America Now!, represented the "public competitor" point of view.

For ease of navigation, the posts for all four days of the debate are listed below.

Question 1:  “How does your solution help us get the runaway train that is the cost of health care in this country under control?”

Read the response by Jason Rosenbaum

Read the response by Dr. Don McCanne

Read Jason Rosenbaum's rebuttal

Question 2:  "Is there anything valuable that private insurance brings to the table which, with far more muscular federal regulation, would enhance an American universal health care system?"

Read the response by Dr. Don McCanne

Read the response by Jason Rosenbaum

Read Dr. McCanne's rebuttal

Question 3: "What are these plans doing to ensure there are enough physicians, particularly primary care practitioners, to cover the huge new influx of patients with coverage?"

Read Jason Rosenbaum's response

Read Dr. Don McCanne's response

Read Jason Rosenbaum's rebuttal

Question 4:  "How can we ensure that if we get a reform bill out of the Senate at all, that it achieves quality, affordable health care for all Americans?"

Read Dr. Don McCanne's response

Read Jason Rosenbaum's response

Read Dr. Don McCanne's rebuttal

Timothy Foley Tim has been an online organizer and blogger on health care policy for the Obama for America campaign and the Committee of Interns and Residents/SEIU Healthcare.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Blog Debate: Final Thought on How We Win
NEXT STORY:
Why I'm Asking Aetna to Cover My Surgery

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.