Boring Autism Newsfeed Classification 101

by Dora Raymaker · 2009-06-03 09:22:00 UTC
Topics:

a person is lying in a body of calm water. there is no land in sight behind him just more water and a blue sky with some clouds on the horizon. the person is holding up a newspaper out of the water open in front of them.Sometimes stories come through in the news feeds that inspire, incite, or otherwise grab my attention and demand that I write about them. But the longer I watch the feeds, the less often that happens, the more often the same old stories just repeat themselves with different names. Here's a sampling of some endlessly recycled stories that have especially irritated me in last few days, in no particular order:

Story #1: Amazing Supercrip Does Something that Goes Against Autism Stereotypes! OMGWOW! These are stories about "overcoming," "in spite of," and "against all odds." Often they genuinely are about something newsworthy and cool, only media-spun straight to the land of dehumanizing. These stories can't just say so-and-so did something cool, they have to somehow compare it to the person's autism. And the more dramatically the better. It's never "Jane Doe sang the national anthem at the ball game," or even "Jane Doe, who is autistic, sang the national anthem at the ball game." No, it's "When Jane Doe was 5, doctors said she'd never talk. Death bells tolled. It rained over her house every day for six years straight. But now! Against all odds! Jane Doe has conquered her autism to sing the national anthem at the ball game--in spite of what those doctors said!" Um... what part of singing the national anthem at the ball game wasn't incredibly cool enough? For anyone! Ah, the disablism of the media...

Story #2: I Sold My Body Parts for Autism. All about the money spent on autism. Or donated to autism. Or sacrificed for autism. I've sold my lungs, liver, and right index finger for autism. Never considering the social implications of putting a price tag on a person's life.

Story #3: Fundraiser for Awareness and Eradication! Ooo goodie! If it says "walk for autism," it's one of these stories. If it says "ball for autism," "dinner for autism," "golfing for autism," or (like over 50% of the stories in my google alerts this week) "racing cars for autism," it's also one of these stories. A bunch of people (who are not autistic) pat themselves on the back for obtaining money to do things that autistic people have not said they are actually interested in having done. Bonus points for heavy pity angles.

Story #4: Transporters Video. I kid you not, this really is a whole story classification unto itself. A non-small percentage of total stories that come through my feeds are this story over and over. And then over. I was complaining about how over and over this story was all the way back in February. But clearly, it's not over. The marketing people for this video are amazing. This story just won't leave my feeds. It comes in waves. It lasts for months on end. The most newsworthy thing about this video is how amazingly newsworthy it continues to be even though it's been circulating forever with no actual new information (or old information for that matter).

There are more of categories of autism news story, but I'll save them for another day when my feeds are relentlessly repetitive and redundantly redundant and therefor I've nothing to write about except how much the stories in the feeds suck. I don't think I'd mind so much if it wasn't for the fact that there's so much injustice--and also so much beauty--that never gets the coverage it deserves.

The same old boring stories get reported on while real atrocities are neglected. Is the Transporters video really more important than not having basic civil rights? Than dying because you have no basic civil rights? Really?

PREVIOUS STORY:
A Family's Story
NEXT STORY:
Why I'm Asking Aetna to Cover My Surgery

COMMENTS (6)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.