BREAKING: Kiva Now Funding Education Loans

by Nathaniel Whittemore · 2010-09-20 10:05:00 UTC
Topics:

Kiva, the best known online platform for microlending, has just announced that lenders on their site will now be able to fund loans to students in the developing world, starting with a handful of students in Paraguay, Bolivia, and Lebanon. It's a significant move, both for the company and for the growing education crowdfunding space.

The Kiva Student Microloans program is a natural follow-on to the business microloans that Kiva lenders have been funding for the last five years. The format of the loans is quite similar to their existing loan portfolio, with small amounts requested and a pre-determined repayment timeline.

The move into student microloans is one of, if not the most significant updates to their model since their launch a half-decade ago. While their last big shift -- beginning to include loans to US micro-businesses -- was somewhat controversial, this growth will more likely resonate with Kiva's existing passionate lender base.

By moving into education loans, Kiva is entering a space inhabited by a number of startups, including groups like Enzi who are experimenting with fundamentally different forms of loan repayment (in their case, it is pegged to a percentage of student earning when they leave school). More notable, perhaps, is Vittana, who have been developing a robust pipeline of partners and students on a very similar model.

Already the internet is full of comments asking whether a) Kiva should have just worked with Vittana (or, "merge" with them), b) whether it creates competition with Vittana. Here are my thoughts on that:

1. Kiva has ridiculously powerful assets to move into this space. Kiva has a base of 750,000+ lenders, a huge percentage of which give regularly and continuously. They have a network of more than 100 finance partners around the world who they know and trust. They have (for good and ill) the eye and attention of the media. They can operate, instantly, at a much, much bigger scale than anyone in the space.

2. That's good news if you care about education access. The point is that, forget all the conversations of "competition." If you care about education access, you gotta be pretty excited about the attention and resources that this move brings to the space.

3. The idea that this is bad for the actors already in the space is probably pretty dubious. First, no matter what scale Kiva are playing at, the demand for education loans is going to dramatically outstrip the supply of lenders, which makes the value of consolidating actors in the space pretty low in my book. Second, dedicated services always have benefits over larger platforms. Larger platforms have scale and distribution, but also expectations and a certain lack of mobility. Groups like Vittana and Enzi are far more likely to be able to experiment with key pieces of the model. Third, there is a good argument that having a field leader enter the space actually "raises all boats" by bringing more attention and new money.

I think it's an awesome move, and ultimately will be good not just for Kiva but for the education funding space as a whole.

Read the press release here.

Photo credit: Emily Carlin

Nathaniel Whittemore is the founder of Assetmap. Previously he was the founding director of the Northwestern University Center for Global Engagement.
PREVIOUS STORY:
TEDxChange: Live Streaming a Global Movement
NEXT STORY:
Facing Forward: The End of the Social Entrepreneurship Blog on Change.org

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.