Britain's New Health Minister Lambasts Jamie Oliver

by Katherine Gustafson · 2010-07-02 06:30:00 UTC

Jamie Oliver's full of it. At least that's the take of Andrew Lansley, Britain's new health minister, who stated that the celebrity chef's agenda for tackling childhood obesity by improving school lunches is misguided. He reportedly told the British Medical Association that Oliver's tactic of "constantly lecturing people" is not effective in getting kids to eat more of the healthy lunches that the school system has been working hard to provide.

Oliver, known in the U.S. for his healthy-eating campaign in West Virginia, which was documented in the reality TV show Jamie Oliver's Food Revolution, has campaigned for the last six years to ban junk food from Britain's schools and change the content of the country's school lunches.

Oliver, for his part, responded that Lansley's opinion is inaccurate, and that his statements are an "insult" to the school lunch cooks and other staff people who care deeply about getting healthier meals to kids. "I'm not encouraged by the news that the new health minister has summed up eight years of hard work in a few lines for the sake of a headline," he said, according to the UK's Telegraph. "I hope that we can meet soon so I can hear more about his practical ideas for ensuring this generation of children doesn't die earlier than their parents."

Commentator Harry Phibbs agrees that the minister's comments are unhelpful, titling his opinion piece in the UK's Globe and Mail, "Health Secretary should clean up his own kitchen before taking aim at celebrity chefs." Lansley, he asserts, would be better off working on banning trans fats than spending his time "denouncing Jamie Oliver."

Phibbs also makes the cogent point that making real reforms in a system is hard and slow work, so if it's true that the number of kids eating school lunch has gone down in reaction to the healthier fare, that is no reason to throw in the towel before people have gotten used to the new way of doing things. News flash: Kids think bad-for-you food tastes better. So of course they're not going to be thrilled that their menu is now heavier on the broccoli and lighter on the, a Phibbs puts it, "Turkey Twizzlers."

But who are the adults here? Since when do we let the tastes of children entirely determine what we feed them? I'd sure hate to see how Lansley is feeding his own children if he is so apt to let the "but I don't like it" argument rule all dinner-table decisions. Come on, public officials. Let's start being adults and feeding our children what we know they should be eating, not what they tell us their taste buds crave.

Photo: Jeff Sandquist via Flickr

Katherine Gustafson is a freelance writer and editor with a background in international nonprofit organizations.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Congress: Bringing Kids Gross Lunches Since 1973
NEXT STORY:
Join the Social Media Day of Action to Rid Girl Scout Cookies of Forest-Destroying Palm Oil

COMMENTS (2)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.