Can a Catholic University Teach a Course on Gay Marriage?

by Michael Jones · 2010-05-02 09:26:00 UTC

ChurchSeton Hall University is a Catholic school in South Orange, New Jersey, known as being a pretty prominent university when it comes to academics. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito taught there. U.S. Under Secretary of State Ellen Tauscher went there. It has the number one business school in the entire state of New Jersey.

But can a college with such a trusted name in academics teach a course on gay marriage? That's the question facing the university, in the wake of a stinging rebuke from Newark Archbishop John Myers.

The plan was this: Professor W. King Mott was scheduled to teach a political science course on the subject of gay marriage, approved by both the political science department at Seton Hall and the Dean's office. It wasn't an advocacy course, but rather an overview of the subject, studying perspectives on the subject of gay marriage from a variety of philosophies, including Eurocentric, Asian ... and naturally, the perspective of gay marriage proffered by the institutional Catholic Church. Call it gay marriage 101, if you will.

But if Archbishop Myers gets his way, you won't be able to call this course anything, other than canceled.

Archbishop Myers, who as head of the Catholic diocese in which Seton Hall rests, sits on Seton Hall's Board of Trustees. And while he has no authority to cancel a class, he can certainly try to lobby others to do so. Which is exactly what he chose to do with a strongly worded statement to Seton Hall administrators and students.

"This proposed course seeks to promote as legitimate a train of thought that is contrary to what the Church teaches. As a result, the course is not in synch with Catholic teaching," Archbishop Myers said. "Consequently, the board of trustees of Seton Hall have asked the board of regents to investigate the matter of this proposed course and to take whatever action is required under the law to protect the Catholicity of this university."

He went on to say that the thought of students getting an overview on the subject of gay marriage "troubles me greatly."

This is a huge problem, and one that could threaten the academic integrity of Seton Hall and other Catholic institutions. As Professor Mott said multiple times, this is not an advocacy course. This is a political science course.

Theoretically, the Catholic Church opposes the use of nuclear weapons. Would they object to a political science course that gave an overview of nuclear history? Most likely not (and if they did, woe be to the rankings of Seton Hall's political science department). The same should go here. This isn't about lobbying students to support gay marriage; this is about teaching them a subject that dominates contemporary politics. Is that such a sin?

Meanwhile, a few students spoke to The Setonian, Seton Hall University's student publication, supporting the idea of the course. One junior, Anthony Angelella, said that he was excited to see the course listed among Fall 2010 offerings.

"I was surprised to see the class offered, but I'm excited to see what can come from it,” Angelella said. "I think that, as a Catholic myself, the class being offered just shows that a Catholic campus doesn't have to be so cut and dry about controversial issues."

Perhaps Angelella should try telling that to Archbishop Myers.

Photo credit: puroticorico

Michael Jones is a Change.org Editor. He has worked in the field of human rights communications for a decade, most recently for Harvard Law School.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Make Way for Lesbian Swans
NEXT STORY:
Bullied high schooler convinces MPAA to change ‘Bully’ rating to “PG-13”

COMMENTS (13)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.