Can a Wall Street Exec Run NYC Public Housing?

by Leigh Graham · 2009-05-24 09:00:00 UTC

(In case you couldn't tell, I'm catching up with my NY Times newsfeed this weekend.)

Interesting article on possible class conflicts between Mayor Bloomberg's choice to run the NYC Housing Authority, former Lehman Bros. exec, John Rhea, and the public housing residents he'll serve:

Asked on Wednesday why he decided to pursue a job in the public sector, Mr. Rhea started his answer with a joke. “Well,” he said, “obviously I’m not taking the job for the pay.” His salary will be $189,700, far short of what many of his fellow M.B.A.’s are making.

It was the sort of joke that got laughs in City Hall, but might not have gotten the same reaction at the Grant Houses or other complexes. The average annual household income among public housing tenants is $22,728, and 22,000 of the 173,000 households in the system receive some form of public assistance. Tenants said they worry that Mr. Rhea will be unable to connect with them.

Exactly.

Rhea has financial planning experience and lots of connections, from the sound of it.  Good and good.  But can he fully grasp the needs, rights and desires of his 400k residents?  Time will tell, especially in the early days, we'll need to watch to see how much he gets out to connect, to embark on a "listening tour", if you will, especially to counter the skeptics. (And note: tenants' councils do not necessarily speak for tenants, and sometimes are considered more in allegiance to the Authority and powers-that-be than their fellow tenants.  But I'm not familiar with the NYC case here.)

Check out the Ivory Tower strawman he throws in to the mix, the reality that fewer than 20% of PH residents receive public assistance, and the throwaway comment that gasp!, PH residents read Shakespeare and write poetry!

Stay tuned.

(Btw, am I a broken record yet?)

(Photo of PH in Brooklyn by Payton Chung)

PREVIOUS STORY:
Florida City Caught Criminalizing the Homeless
NEXT STORY:
Sallie Mae Blinks!

COMMENTS (2)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.