Can Hybrid Wind Help Alaska's Rural Poor?

by Tara Kyle · 2010-03-16 08:12:00 UTC

The isolated, impoverished villages of western Alaska are in the sports world spotlight this week. Mushers from across the globe (including, for the first time, a Jamaican) are zooming toward the finish of the Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race, a 1,100-mile feat of endurance billed as the world's "last great race."

The pups run in commemoration of the 1925 journey of cartoon-minted hero Balto, a Siberian husky who stopped a diphtheria epidemic by transporting the antitoxin from Anchorage to Nome. It should take more than the spectacle of cute huskies zipping through snow drifts and subzero conditions, though, to get you to pay attention to tiny race-route communities like Koyuk and Nulato.

For all the massive changes Alaska has undergone in the 85 years since (statehood, a pipeline and Sarah Palin, to name a few), the state's 230 rural villages still lack sufficient access to employment, health care and education.

While Alaska's statewide poverty rate of nine percent is among the lowest in the country, the levels in remote western boroughs like Nome, Wade-Hampton and Bethel are over twice as high. These same areas, by the way, are populated in overwhelming majority by Alaska natives.

Energy costs are a major culprit. You might think a place so famously rich in fossil fuels that it cuts its residents an annual check just for living there would be immune from spiraling electric bills. But most Alaskan oil gets shipped down to West coast refineries, and these days, oil and natural gas sales in Alaska are tied to world commodity prices. Plus, in a state with lots of land but very few roads, transportation costs are steep.

Because the villages are disconnected from any power grid, their troubles are exponentially worse. The average residential electric bill in the U.S. is 11 cents per kilowatt hour, compared to 17 cents in Alaska. Yet in the villages, which are dependent on shipments of diesel and fuel oil, those bills can climb as high as nearly a dollar a kilowatt hour.

"It's very, very difficult for people in these villages to pay their utility bills, to pay their heating, to pay their electricity," said Chris Rose, founder and executive director of the Renewable Energy Alaska Project. "Eventually, these communities will not be able to exist if energy prices keep going up."

That crisis is, at least, driving innovation. Alaska is at the forefront of developing wind-diesel hybrid systems, an emerging technology which pairs diesel generators with wind turbines. For rural communities, this means less dependence on diesel's volatile prices, which have jumped dramatically in recent years.

So is wind-diesel the silver bullet? Well, not just yet. For now, advocates can only promise to stabilize electric bills, not dramatically lower them. Experts still want to create higher penetration systems -- in other words, hybrids that take a greater proportion of their energy from wind to diesel. And everyone agrees that finding a way to cut heating bills is the next challenge.

But the potential is huge. About 15 villages currently have hybrid systems in place, thanks to the work of organizations such as the Alaska Wind-Diesel Applications Center. More than 100 possess the strong winds necessary to make them good candidates.

So watch these last legs of the Iditarod. Root for Team Margaritaville. But while celebrating past heroics, remember that this part of the world faces very modern problems.

Photo credit: Alaskan Dude

Tara Kyle is a multimedia reporter/producer whose stories have appeared in FLYP Media, PBS Online NewsHour, Time.com and The Real Deal. She won a 2008 Webby Award.
PREVIOUS STORY:
The (Still) Misunderstood Poverty-Obesity Connection
NEXT STORY:
Sallie Mae Blinks!

COMMENTS (2)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.