Can Obama Save Afghanistan and Pakistan from Walmart?

by Amanda Kloer · 2009-06-30 12:00:00 UTC
Topics:

President Obama is currrently deep in negotiations with national retailers and Democrats about giving duty-free access to imports from Afganistan and Pakistan to U.S.-based companies, particularly Wal-Mart.  The legislation has hit some snags, however, in part because of Wal-Mart's complaints over the "pretty onerous" labor rules.  I'll wait while you pick your jaw off the ground. 

The labor regulations are not, in fact, onerous.  They would require the U.S. to appoint an indepepndent party to monitor labor conditions at textile and apparel factories in Pakistan or Afghanistan.  They would also refuse to allow duty-free imports from factories that don’t adhere to core international labor standards, such as prohibiting forced labor and child labor and guaranteeing the right to organize a union. In other words, these regulations would provide workers their basic human rights and attempt to prevent trafficking in factories in Afghanistan and Pakistan.  The Chamber of Commerce and other business groups, however, have complained that these labor regulations are “counterproductive and unworkable new labor criteria and monitoring requirements.”

I'm sure very few of you will be surprised to hear that Wal-Mart has a long, long history of being a terrible company for workers, both those who work in their stores and those who make the products they sell.  And I'm sure even fewer will be surprised to know that the recent conflict, political turmoil, and economic toubles which have plagued Afghanistan and Pakistan have left thousands jobless and vulnerable to trafficking.  Plus, Pakistan especially has had significant child labor problems.  Without proper safeguards and protections for workers, Wal-Mart plus Pakistan sounds like a recipe for trafficking.   

So can Obama and the Democrats stand up and save Afghanistan and Pakistan from "jobs" that may be little more than forms of exploitation?  Can they strike a blanace between business interests and workers' freedom from exploitation?  Or will Pakistan be the next hotspot fo men, women and children trafficked into textiles? 

Image from latenightwallflower.com

Amanda Kloer is a Change.org Editor and has been a full-time abolitionist in several capacities for seven years. Follow her on Twitter @endhumantraffic
PREVIOUS STORY:
Red Light Special: Felt Double Frame is Whimsical and Worthy
NEXT STORY:
Today is National Human Trafficking Awareness Day, how are you going to take action?

COMMENTS (2)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.