Can Redrawing the Map "Fix" Africa?

When I talk to people who’ve never been to Africa, there’s sometimes a tendency to treat the continent as a dysfunctional object. I’ll get asked questions about ethnic conflict and corruption, and I’ll get the 30-second warning that Africa is ceasing to hold my interlocutor’s attention: “Well, what do you think it will take to fix it?” Which is exactly the same thing I said last time I had to have my slowly-dying hard drive replaced.

“Undoing colonialism might be nice,” I occasionally quip. Of course that’s impossible, and of course contemporary problems in Africa aren’t as simple as, “the white man showed up and screwed it all up, forever.”

So it’s a delicate thing to discuss suggestions like this one, which propose redrawing African borders to “fix” Africa. G. Pascal Zachary, no stranger to the continent, says, “No initiative would do more for happiness, stability, and economic growth in Africa today than an energetic and enlightened redrawing of these harmful lines.”

You probably already know the idea: that the borders divide ethnic groups and communities, sliced up trade routes and cattle paths, and otherwise “balkanized” African life. The implication is that were it not for all of those arbitrary divisions, African states would function more like…well, like European states.

I’m not so sure. First, who does the “enlightened redrawing” and how do you arbitrate territory disputes? The Ethiopian-Eritrean border war, in which 100,000 soldiers died over a dusty border town of virtually no economic significance, suggests this a question worth a few pre-cartography roundtables.

Second, how do we know that the “failure” of African states is due to their diversity? There are some states where multiple ethnic groups can be a bit of a problem — think DR Congo — but there are other states that manage that diversity pretty well, like Sierra Leone.

But the biggest problem with this idea is it changes the players, but not the game. Whatever the borders, we expect African nation-states to behave like our own Westphalian nation-states. I suppose global interaction, let alone cooperation, requires we all have a basic agreement about the state system in which we operate.

But whatever the borders, the notion of a nation-state Zachary posits is one that outsiders forced on the continent, usually violently, more than 100 years ago. I’m guessing that passing the pen now isn’t going to magically solve the problem.

Photo Credit: Edu-tourist

Jina Moore is a professional journalist and correspondent for the Christian Science Monitor whose work also appears in Newsweek, The Boston Globe and Best American Science Writing. Read more at http://www.jinamoore.com/.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Helen Thomas, Victim of Racial Hypocrisy?
NEXT STORY:
Campaign about Apple Factories in China Gains Wide and Diverse Support

COMMENTS (2)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.