Contractor for Planet Hollywood, Louis Vitton Not Paying Workers

by Amanda Kloer · 2010-01-23 13:00:00 UTC
Topics:

Prime Pacific Builders, a company that, according to their website, has worked on at least a Louis Vitton luxury store and Planet Hollywood location, is being accused of some serious labor violations. The group of foreign construction workers they hired for their latest project in Guam claims they've never been paid for their work. But while Prime Pacific Builders certainly violated the law by not paying their workers, the circumstances around the wage stiffing also reek of slavery.

First of all, Prime Pacific Builders brought the workers over on a HB-2 visa, which means that the workers were only allowed to do "temporary" work, and they couldn't leave their job without proof of another offer in the U.S. It's easy for unscrupulous employers to use this sort of visa to convince workers that they are not allowed to leave their job at all, or they will be arrested or deported.

The second indication of trafficking is that the men lived where they worked -- in a house they were in the process of renovating. News reports have not gone into detail about the living standards or quality of housing provided, but workers who are housed at their job site and made to repair the place they live in raises an army of red trafficking flags.

And finally, the biggest sign is that the workers were never paid. It's not that Pacific Rim Builders paid them less than they promised or in irregular intervals. The workers never saw a penny for their labor. No money for your work? Sounds like slavery to me.

In cases like these, it's important to remember that freedom is at the heart of human trafficking, and that people are trafficking victims when someone uses force, fraud, or coercion to keep them from being free. In this case, the nature of the visa, location of the housing, and lack of payment were all tools which Prime Pacific Builders could have used to coerce the men into staying, by threatening them with deportation or other harms. The Department of Labor is currently investigating the workers' claims and the company's behavior.

The other lesson this case teaches is that a luxury brand is not immune from the taint of slavery any more than a discount brand is. As someone who has lived on an activist/writer's salary her whole adult life, I've never actually set foot in a Louis Vitton store, but several hip-hop songs tell me they are full of pricey, high-quality items. I have, embarrassingly, set foot in a Planet Hollywood to enjoy an overpriced sandwich amid cool stuff from movies I've seen. As two well-known brands, I never would have dreamed the stores would have been built by a contractor who doesn't pay their workers.

I guess the moral of the story is that you can't judge a store -- or restaurant or apparent simple wage violation -- by what you see on the outside. And, of course, don't take a job with Prime Pacific Builders.

Photo credit: sebastian davis

Amanda Kloer is a Change.org Editor and has been a full-time abolitionist in several capacities for seven years. Follow her on Twitter @endhumantraffic
PREVIOUS STORY:
Wal-Mart Briefly Imposes Sanctions, Pretends to Have a Soul
NEXT STORY:
Today is National Human Trafficking Awareness Day, how are you going to take action?

COMMENTS (1)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.