Could Abstinence-Until-Ready Programs Work?

by Alex DiBranco · 2010-02-01 21:20:00 UTC
Topics:

Abstinence-only-until-marriage programs have been a major moralistic fail in delaying sexual activity and preventing teen pregnancy. But apparently there's a new kind of abstinence education in town, one that has shown more promising results.

MSNBC headlines: "Abstinence-ed, minus the morals, may work." The key point in the recent study is that the program under evaluation is not your typical inaccuracy-ridden, condoms-bashing, slut-shaming, gender stereotyping abstinence education. Instead, the program encourages abstinence-until-ready -- a message I can definitely get behind. It's vital that young people understand that they control their own bodies, and that nobody else has the right to pressure them into having sex too early. But it's also unrealistic to expect that the majority of American students will share the moral condemnation abstinence-until-marriage programs dish against premarital sex.

Comprehensive sex education advocates point out that the study targeted 6th and 7th graders, who are young enough that a focus on abstinence might be more useful than for older students. Importantly, since the program refrained from denouncing and lying about contraceptive use, for the one-third of abstinence-educated students who did end up having sex within the next two years, there was no negative impact on condom use. (42% of students who underwent a comprehensive sex ed program, including abstinence education, started having sex in that time span, and 52% in a program that only taught safe-sex techniques.)

What's most intriguing about this study, yet was buried in the news articles I read on the subject, is that researchers were only looking at African-American students. Fellow Women's Rights blogger Whitney Teal wrote just last week that, while ab-only-until-marriage programs have failed to prevent teen pregnancy, comprehensive sex ed also hasn't been doing the trick for many minority teens, and called for an alternative approach. Could this be it? We'll need further studies to figure that out. But Monica Rodriquez of the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States says optimistically, "One of the things that's exciting about this study is that it says we have a new tool to add to our repertoire."

Photo credit: meddygarnet

Alex DiBranco is a Change.org Editor who has worked for the Nation, Political Research Associates, and the Center for American Progress. She is now based in New York City.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Obama Plans to Take a Hatchet to Women's Health?
NEXT STORY:
Fox News' Trotta Still Doesn't Get It: I Want Her Rape Apologism Off the Air

COMMENTS (60)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.