Daily Darfur: African Columnists Get Feisty

by Michelle . · 2009-07-22 03:13:00 UTC
Topics:

I'm becoming a big fan of Ugandan and Kenyan newspaper columnists, who've taken a strong stance against the rising tide of support for Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir in recent weeks. Yesterday, a piece in the Nairobi-based Daily Nation gets rights to the point:

"According to the AU, arresting al-Bashir would lead to an escalation of violence in Darfur, besides leading to the collapse of the January 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement.

This is all crap. The world knows that even prior to his indictment, al-Bashir failed to control the violence in Darfur and has been scuttling the Comprehensive Peace Agreement."

I couldn't agree more.

In Uganda, the New Vision Daily defends a foreign ministry official for his comments last week about arresting Bashir. Making reference to a comical slip-of-the-tongue by former Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien in front of Queen Elizabeth II, the columnist writes:

"Now, I know Uganda's minister for international relations Oryem Okello is a gentleman who could never swear in public, but I would forgive him, in fact, even applaud him for letting out a string of choice equivalent of ‘merde!' toward the unidentified ‘senior government official' of Sudan who wants Oryem's head. The New Vision's headline yesterday ran: ‘Sudan wants Oryem sacked'. Merde!"

For those not familiar with French curse wordes, "merde" translates to "sh*t."

Finger-pointing like there's no tomorrow

The Chadian government appears to have backed down from its insistence that air raids against Chadian rebels were conducted on its own side of the border: A government spokesman told Reuters yesterday, "We didn't touch the population or the Sudanese army." He added:

"Sudan wants to portray itself as the victim but everyone knows that it is Sudan who attacks Chad. It doesn't fool anyone ... It is the continuation of the destabilisation of Chad."

Rough translation: "Sure we dropped bombs across the border onto another nation, but we didn't hurt anyone that matters. Besides, it's their fault to begin with."

Quickies

It's all a matter of perspective: The Chinese Xinhua news agency reports that Abyei is "calmly waiting for international arbitration," while the BBC states that "tension is high" in the region ahead of the much-anticipated border ruling. (Note: As 5:45am, as I'm writing this, the decision on the boundary has not yet hit the news wires.)

I'm happy to see Alex Meixner blogging over at Save Darfur --- he's put up several great posts over the past few days about US Envoy Scott Gration and the Obama Administration's ongoing policy review on Sudan. Here's the latest.

The African Union extended the mandate of the UNAMID peacekeeping force for another 12 months. The UN Security Council is set to do the same next week.

Armed gunmen raided an NGO compound in Darfur yesterday, injuring a staff member.

Lastly, Radio Dabanga reports that IDPs in West Darfur were attacked by gunmen, while the four victims of another attack were recovered near El Fasher, North Darfur.

Michelle . has been involved in various activist endeavors, including the Teach Against Genocide pilot campaigns.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Three UN Agencies, Chinese Bicyclist Expelled from Somalia
NEXT STORY:
Campaign about Apple Factories in China Gains Wide and Diverse Support

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.