Darfur Developments in 2008: Indictments and Escalation

by Michelle . · 2008-10-15 21:03:00 UTC
Topics:

Violence in Darfur has taken on a new character in 2008, with new fronts of confrontation and an ever-decreasing space for humanitarian access to the region. The latest estimates put the total death toll of the genocide at 300,000. The UN Security Council voted to extend UNAMID’s mandate through July 2009, but the force remains fatally under-staffed and ill-equipped—often unable to protect itself, much less the civilian population in Darfur.

Government-sponsored attacks continue to target civilians under the guise of routing out insurgency, with a particularly sharp increase after an attack on Omdurman, a suburb of Khartoum, by the Darfuri Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) in May. The surprise attack, so close to Khartoum, shattered the regime’s myths of security and control, and revealed that the rebels are becoming an even more serious threat to the regime’s stability. Violent reprisals by the government against civilians in North Darfur included the bombing of villages, arbitrary detentions, torture, rape, summary executions, and more.

ICC Indictment Proceedings

On July 14, Chief Prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo presented evidence to the International Criminal Court (ICC) purporting to show Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir’s clear intent to commit genocide against ethnic groups in Darfur, including his central role in financing and directing the attacks of the Janjaweed militia. Ocampo requested an indictment against al-Bashir on charges of genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes in Darfur. A three-judge pre-trial panel is expected to rule on the matter this fall.

Al-Bashir reacted (predictably) harshly against the possibility of an indictment, and has drawn a surprising cadre of supporters in his efforts to pressure the UN Security Council (UNSC) to suspend the proceedings. Supporters of the invocation of Article 16, the section of the Rome Statute of the ICC that enables to UNSC to suspend indictment proceedings, claim that an indictment will interfere with the peace process in Darfur—although no viable peace negotiations are currently underway.

The African Union and Arab League have been particularly vociferous in their opposition to the ICC, with the support of UNSC permanent members China and Russia. However, the US is particularly adamant in its opposition to Article 16—surprising many, given the Bush administrations distaste for the ICC—and France and the UK would also likely veto such a resolution unless Khartoum makes substantial strides towards ending the conflict.

Escalating Violence

Rather than make substantive moves towards peace in the wake of a possible ICC indictment, al-Bashir continues to attack villages in Darfur—always under the pretense of counter insurgency measures, but nearly always targeting civilians. Rebel groups in Darfur accused the government of carrying out a string of attacks in North Darfur since August, often following the regime’s usual M.O. of aerial bombings followed by ground attacks by the army and Janjaweed militias. In August, Sudanese security forces raided Darfur’s largest camp for internally displaced persons (IDP’s), Kalma, killing at least 31 civilians, though some estimates are higher.

The deteriorating security situation is seriously impinging upon access for humanitarian relief workers, and constant government scrutiny and interference further hinders the delivery of assistance. Many organizations, including Doctors Without Borders, evacuated staff after a series of violent attacks.

Michelle . has been involved in various activist endeavors, including the Teach Against Genocide pilot campaigns.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Face of Fair Trade: Ugandan Basket Weavers Tackle Poverty with Fair Trade
NEXT STORY:
Campaign about Apple Factories in China Gains Wide and Diverse Support

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.