DC to Celebrate 4/20 By Legalizing Medical Marijuana

by Te-Ping Chen · 2010-04-20 09:35:00 UTC

If you're a cancer patient or someone with HIV/AIDS, you'd do well to live in a state like California or Rhode Island. Or any one of the 13 states that allow patients to use marijuana for medical purposes such as stimulating appetite, reducing nausea and treating pain. And today, after an aptly timed 4/20 city council vote, you can add D.C. to that list of jurisdictions.

It's a decision that's been well over a decade in coming. As early as 1998, D.C. voters passed a referendum legalizing medical marijuana, just two years after California became the first state in the nation to accept the drug. (And nearly 150 years after the U.S. Pharmocopeia first started listing the drug as a treatment for conditions from cholera to rheumatism.) Voter support for the measure was weighted nearly 7-to-3 in favor of its legalization — a greater majority than we've seen in any other such ballot-passed initiatives around the country.

But the District's laws are subject to Congressional approval, and for years, the GOP-controlled Congress thwarted the city's move — much as it's blocked myriad bills in D.C. over the years (for eg., D.C.'s domestic partnership law: passed in 1992, it only went into effect in 2002).

As Matt wrote this morning, we've seen resounding progress on drug reform in recent years. In fact, since 1998, the original Congressional opponent of D.C.'s law, Bob Barr, has gone — if you can believe it — from a hardcore drug hawk to a converted libertarian who's made the ardent case for legalization as a presidential candidate.

D.C.'s bill, which would allow patience to receive 30-day supplies of the drug from city-sanctioned distribution centers, is expected to breeze through city council today. Particularly in a city plagued by an HIV/AIDS epidemic that's grown 22% since just 2006 — a rate that's on par with Uganda, and higher than West Africa — it's an incredibly important victory.

It's also one freighted with a deep symbolic importance, one reflective of how far Congress has come on the issue, as well as how far it still has to go. Today, the nation's veterans are denied the same access to medical marijuana treatment that a teenager in California can receive. Marijuana charges can keep an individual from accessing public benefits from housing assistance to student loans (though they're available to rapists and murderers). Even in states where medical marijuana is legal, students can't treat their symptoms in their own dormitories without risking repercussions, thanks to federal law.

This afternoon, just steps away from Freedom Plaza, D.C. legislators will do the job they're elected for — carrying out the will of their constituents. Let's hope that, barely a mile away, members of Congress are taking note of the same.

Photo Credit: trawin

Te-Ping Chen Te-Ping Chen is a freelance writer and U.S. Truman Scholar whose writing has appeared in the Nation Magazine, the South China Morning Post magazine, Le Soir, and Slate.com.
PREVIOUS STORY:
What a Pot Holiday Like 4/20 Really Means
NEXT STORY:
Make the Call! Stop the Torture of Special Needs Children in Massachusetts

COMMENTS (1)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.