Death Row Prisoners in North Carolina File Racial Bias Suits

by Chris Cassidy · 2010-08-14 06:06:00 UTC

Is the death penalty fair to people of all races? This week, scores of prisoners on North Carolina's death row took the chance to try and test that question.

Last year, North Carolina approved the Racial Justice Act, which empowers judges to overturn a person's death sentence if she finds that racial bias occurred in the sentencing process. Signed a year ago this week by Gov. Beverly Purdue, the law gave the state's 159 death row inmates one year to appeal their sentence. By the deadline — this past Tuesday — fully 119 had filed complaints alleging racial bias in their sentencing.

For my money, they have a pretty good shot and proving their case. Here in the U.S., the color of a victim's skin is the best predictor for whether a convicted murderer will be sentenced to death. As Te-Ping Chen blogged here earlier this summer, defendants in North Carolina are three times more likely to receive the death penalty if they're convicted of murdering a white person.

Racial bias is systemic: Southern prosecutors, for example, are particularly well-known for their efforts to keep their juries lily-white — by dismissing black jurors for any number of reasons, including for being "too vocal" or "arrogant" (as one Alabama prosecutor declared this spring).

Cases like that of Jeremy Murrell — also of North Carolina — makes such bias glaringly clear. Murrell, who's black, was convicted of killing a white victim, and sentenced to death by a majority-white jury that was assembled by prosecutors who struck fully 80% of qualified black jurors from the jury pool, and only 26% of qualified white jurors. Not surprisingly, Murrell is now challenging his sentence under the Act.

Of the 119 convicts challenging their death sentences, some will win and some will lose. There's no doubt that the litigation will be expensive — but that doesn't make the suits any less worth pursuing. You can't put a value on an innocent life — or the integrity of our judicial system.

Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Chris Cassidy writes on law, judicial nominations and the Constitution as they pertain to criminal justice reform and women's rights.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Film a Cop, Post to YouTube, Go to Jail for 16 Years?
NEXT STORY:
Make the Call! Stop the Torture of Special Needs Children in Massachusetts

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.