Denied a Promotion Because She’s a Woman

by Matt Kelley · 2009-11-16 06:50:00 UTC

Andrea Young was a 13-year veteran of the Pennsylvania State Police when she sat for the state’s promotion exam. She scored sixth out of 2,000 test-takers. But she was skipped for the promotion, and she argues in a new lawsuit that the snub was just one facet of the consistent harassment she suffered as a female officer on the force.

Just 4% of state cops in Pennsylvania are women, and Young said she endured jokes about her sex life and even received a photo of one officer’s penis. Other officers admitted to her they were cheating on the test, but then accused her of cheating. She says she wasn’t only targeted because she’s a woman, but because she was a speaking up about the conditions under which she worked.

Another suit against the Pennsylvania agency alleges that an illegal background check was run on a civilian by a jealous ex-boyfriend in the agency. An attorney for the civilian plaintiff, Jerry Grossnickle, told the Philadelphia Daily News: “There’s a buddy system that pervades the state police, a system in which criminal laws are broken to protect the clique."

This culture isn’t unique to the Pennsylvania State Police -- it's pervasive throughout law enforcement. Gender discrimination needs to be addressed head-on before our law enforcement agencies can even begin to talk about equality. Aggressive hiring should aim to balance the gender gap -- a force with 4% women in 2009 is simply unacceptable. Female officers deserve to work in a welcoming and safe environment, and we can’t trust a boys’ club that harasses female officers to treat female crime victims or defendants with respect.

Via PoliceOne and the Philadelphia Daily News

Photo by Dtbohrer

Matt Kelley is the Online Communications Manager at the Innocence Project and a graduate of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University. Follow him on Twitter @mattjkelley.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Ohio Executions: Straight, No Chaser
NEXT STORY:
DJJ Won't Let Youth Into Meeting about Prison Conditions

COMMENTS (1)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.