Detroit Murders Drop 25%. But At What Cost?
Last week, we brought you news that Newark's achieved its first murder-free month since 1966. This week, it's Detroit turning heads for the city's dropping murder rate. The city saw 25% fewer murders in the first quarter of 2010 compared to last year. That's an impressive change.
But what did it cost? Some are wondering, for example, if new Detroit Police Chief Warren Evans is essentially fighting crime through use of racial profiling.
It seems to me that the jury is still out on that question. While a some of Detroit's tactics are questionable, police presence on the street does prevent crime. Something is working, so we shouldn't so quick to write such tactics off.
Evans credits his "Mobile Strike Force" with a role in the decline in murders in Detroit. The initiative calls on police to stop cars by designating "hot spots" for traffic violations — they then take liberties to search the cars for drugs and guns. These searches may be technically illegal much of the time, but most will never be challenged.
Robert Brignall at the Detroit Examiner reports that a February memo from Mobile Strike Force head Eric Jones warned officers that they could be disciplined if they don't meet traffic stop quotas. Quotas and aggressive searches are troubling — they lead to more stops of people of color, they lead to minor arrests and scuffles with well-meaning people who happen to live in bad neighborhoods. They can lead to unnecessary arrests and days in court, which leads to distrust of the system.
It's a difficult balance. Profiling is wrong and destructive, but police need to focus on high-crime areas. So while Detroit needs to scale back the quotas and the searches and focus on drug crimes, the city is right to put police presence where it's needed.
Chief Evans must proceed carefully, or his plan will backfire in a big way. In the meantime, though, Detroit should be congratulated for its big drop in murders.
Photo Credit: ampersandyslexia







COMMENTS (0)