Division, Again, but of a Different Sort

by Dora Raymaker · 2009-07-01 16:00:00 UTC
Topics:

an 8 x 8 square of alternating black and white squares. the square in the bottom right corner is redI wrote (perhaps way too much) about professional / parent / self-advocate differences recently and the previous week (it is a topic that interests me very much). There's another sort of divide though: the division between the "autism community" and the greater cross-disability community.

At the Megaconference, there were mostly vendor booths from 1) disability rights organizations such as Disability Rights Oregon and the State Independent Living Council, 2) disability-positive service or research organizations such as Oregon ARC and the OIDD, 3) assistive technology companies, selling everything from ergonomic keyboards to telephones to toys.

...and then there were the autism-related booths. All about snake oil, pity, and panic. A harsh reminder of what disability rights groups have rallied against.

There were 65 presentations given over the course of three days, on topics from community weaving to the ADA. Those which were not autism-specific included things like the joys of communication without speech, assistive technology, healthy lifestyles, empowerment, acceptance, and accessibility.

...while the autism-specific presentations were about remediation, normalization, and intervention (remember what Kunc had to say about that).

It's as though autism has been left behind in a pre-1960's, pre-civil rights era. Often I feel as though many people who work specifically with autism have no idea that we are part of a larger community--one that has fought and won some important civil rights battles, including initiating a cultural shift away from the attitudes that produce such demeaning treatment. What's up with that? And, way more importantly, how do we fix it?

PREVIOUS STORY:
Knowing About Autism Earlier & Earlier & Earlier?
NEXT STORY:
Why I'm Asking Aetna to Cover My Surgery

COMMENTS (3)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.