Does LGBT Advertising Make a Company LGBT Friendly?

by Jordan Rubenstein · 2010-05-05 07:05:00 UTC

Advertising grabs us in, manipulating us to change our desires and make us think we need the newest product. A touching message can pull at your heartstrings or a racy message can get your heart pumping. And once your emotions have taken over, you won’t be able to resist making a purchase.

Many companies reach out specifically to LGBT consumers through their advertisements. Some of these companies already have LGBT-friendly policies in place and have shown that they support the message they advertise, such as Levi's and Subaru. Levi’s and Subaru both got a 100% rating on the Human Rights Campaign Corporate Equality Index, meaning both companies treat their LGBT employees well. But they have gone far beyond that -- Levi’s publicly endorsed gay marriage and Subaru was a sponsor for The L Word.

The LGBT community is often quick to form alliances with these companies, grateful that the companies are LGBT-inclusive. And usually, these alliances are beneficial for both the company and LGBT people.

But sometimes LGBT-directed advertising is strictly a business move and is used in attempt to manipulate LGBT people. In 1998, California Proposition 10, called "The Children and Families First Act" was introduced to raise cigarette taxes. The tobacco industry, opposed to the tax raise, directed advertisements at LGBT people to try to change the minds of LGBT voters. In an internal memo, the Tobacco Institute discussed strategies for winning over LGBT voters, including discussing themes such as "lifestyle regulation, government intrusion into private lives, and removing choice as an option for one's life decisions."

Whether or not LGBT people should support a tax increase for cigarettes is a different issue altogether, but what is clear is that the Tobacco Institute was only reaching out to LGBT people for the tobacco industry's own financial gain.

LGBT people and allies should be cautious about the decisions we make and the products we buy. Buying from companies that support LGBT rights is important, but advertisements don't necessarily reflect the beliefs of a company. Witeck Combs, an LGBT communications company, outlined a variety of tactics companies can use to reach out to LGBT consumers. Among the suggestions are providing equal workplace benefits, marketing directly to LGBT people, and including images of LGBT people in advertisements. They also advise companies to avoid only partially committing to the LGBT community.

Companies should follow the suggestions offered by Witeck Combs, and not merely try to buy LGBT consumers through emotional manipulation. It is important for companies to support a diverse workplace and have policies in place to ensure equal treatment and benefits for their LGBT employees. Simply advertising to LGBT people, or partially committing to the LGBT community, is not enough.

Photo credit: SuperFantastic

Jordan Rubenstein is the former president of Carnegie Mellon University's LGBT student organization, ALLIES. Jordan lives in New York City.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Are Marriage Equality Opponents Bigots?
NEXT STORY:
Bullied high schooler convinces MPAA to change ‘Bully’ rating to “PG-13”

COMMENTS (5)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.