Does Philanthropy Have a Place in Social Enterprise?

by Nathaniel Whittemore · 2010-02-16 13:55:00 UTC
Topics:

One of the holy wars of the social entrepreneurship movement is founded on whether both nonprofits and forprofits can count as social enterprises, or whether only one really counts. But with a new Tactical Philanthropy track at this year's Social Capital Markets conference, at least one major player is suggesting that all are welcome.

The Social Capital Markets conference started two years ago as a place to convene all players in the space emerging between doing business and doing good. While the conference has gone to lengths to bring together investors at different points of the social enterprise funding chain, it's never before had an explicit focus on looking at how philanthropy is changing as a field.

In partnership with Tactical Philanthropy -- Sean Stannard-Stockton's philanthropic advisory services firm, which grew out of the blog of the same name -- this year's SoCap will have a track that focuses on how philanthropy is changing, particularly in reaction to an expansion in the types of actors who are trying to create change.

I think it's a great move. First, there are enough major players (most notably the Skoll Foundation) who believe social entrepreneurship needs to be in the nonprofit domain that it makes sense from a field building perspective to have this conversation. Second, and more important to me, I think there are enough examples of really smart companies that had to chose the nonprofit path for financial reasons -- Kiva and Samasource come to mind -- that philanthropy has to have a seat at this table.

One of the questions I'd love to see addressed is how philanthropists determine when their subsidization of an organization is healthy, versus when it is simply giving those organizations an excuse to take longer to figure out how to meet demand. I'm referring explicitly to companies that provide services for nonprofits or for low-income constituencies and also have aspirations to self-sufficiency. I worry that philanthropic subsidies in these cases can sometimes create incentives to spend more resources on increasing the philanthropic pie, rather than improving the product offerings to their main customers.

If you want to learn more about SoCap, visit them at Socialcapitalmarkets.net.

Photo Credit: sociate

Nathaniel Whittemore is the founder of Assetmap. Previously he was the founding director of the Northwestern University Center for Global Engagement.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Are Social Investors Made, or Born?
NEXT STORY:
Facing Forward: The End of the Social Entrepreneurship Blog on Change.org

COMMENTS (1)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.