Does Your Pet Need Health Insurance?

by Lisa Poisso · 2010-09-26 09:00:00 UTC
Topics:

September is National Pet Health Insurance Month — and despite the not-so-lovely transparency of the industry's attempts to snag your attention (and your dollars) this month, the idea's definitely worthy of consideration for those of us living with companion animals.

Some 60 percent of American households include at least one dog, cat, bird or other companion animal. With projected pet expenses for 2010 at $47.7 billion, a financial safety net for emergency care sounds like an obvious strategy. The cost of veterinary services has gone up some 80 percent since 2000, in contrast to a 28.1 percent inflation rate for services in all other industries. And savvy pet owners recognize how quickly even routine expenses add up over time.

Still, even pet owners who warmly embrace their animals as members of the family sometimes hesitate to spend hundreds and thousands of dollars on pet health care.  Their hesitation could actually be putting their own health at risk — that's right, because nurturing a pet means better health for you, too. Pet ownership confers a number of documented benefits, including a lower risk of cardiovascular disease, higher survival rates from heart attacks, significantly lower use of general practitioner services, a reduced risk of asthma and allergic rhinitis for children exposed to pet dander during their first year of their life, and better physical and psychological well-being for seniors.

Veterinarian and attorney Christopher J. Allen, DVM, JD, of Endwell Animal Hospital in Endwell, N.Y., is a pet health insurance convert. "I have disliked a number or aspects of the insurance industry ever since I was an insurance attorney in New York years ago," he says. "Today, the veterinary profession must include pet health insurance as part of the practice protocol. This is the most effective means to manage and assure optimized overall care. Pet health coverage is no longer just for the unexpected injury, illness or emergency."

Regular, preventive visits and even holistic pet care are becoming mainstream, offering pet owners more options than ever before. But are some Americans too poor for pets? We've reported elsewhere here at Change.org how nonprofits are providing financial aid to low-income families with pets, and Congress is considering the first-ever tax break for pet care. California is pressing for measures to increase transparency for pet health care plans, to prevent nasty surprises over pre-existing conditions or high-cost procedures.

Will measures like these be enough to make pet ownership a healthy, financially viable prospect for still more families? What do you think about pet health insurance plans?

Photo credit: Jesse Bikman

Lisa Poisso is an award-winning parenting and family writer who has written about green issues for years.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Rescue Dogs More Than Just OK in OK Go's New Music Video
NEXT STORY:
Petitions Delivered Around the World for Release of Indonesian Circus Dolphins

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.