Don't Buy SFI: Sustainable Forest Certification Gone Bad

by Margaret Swink · 2010-12-01 12:36:00 UTC
Topics:

It takes a lot of time to be a responsible consumer. Time that many of us, if you’re like me, just don’t have. That's why independent certification bodies exist to make socially-conscious shopping easier.

Groups that put a seal of approval on products telling us that our coffee is fair trade, our cosmetics aren’t toxic, our milk is really organic or that our paper has been sourced sustainably are supposed to do the work for us, to distinguish the green from the bad.

But what happens if one of them is lying?

Turns out, that’s exactly the case with paper and wood products certifier the Sustainable Forestry Initiative. According to a new report by ForestEthics, the industry sponsored group has been putting their seal of approval on furniture and paper that's made from destroyed rainforest.

The report reveals that SFI is little more than a logging industry front group, with board members drawn from some of the world’s largest loggers and close financial ties to industry. It also casts doubt on the strength of the group’s audits—the only means that SFI has to ensure that its stamp of approval is backed up by reality.

According to a blog post by ForestEthics executive director Todd Paglia on Huffington Post,

SFI's audits are actually so friendly to forest destruction that in a survey of 543 audits since 2004 only eight found any significant problems—and of these, seven were approved within a year. In other words, the chance of being denied the SFI eco-label, if a company's logging practices are even audited, is .0018%.

So what exactly is SFI certifying? Apparently, the group has no problem putting it’s seal on logging projects that encourage massive landslides and species extinction or those that involve clear-cutting and the massive use of toxic chemicals. The average clearcut approved by SFI equals the size of 90 football fields. Worse, SFI provides no restrictions on the destruction of endangered or irreplaceable old growth forests, like those found in California's Sierras. Not exactly good for the forests, as SFI’s label promises.

None of this, however, has stopped SFI from touring green building conferences touting its label, or even seeking to be included in the nation’s LEED standards for green building.

You can tell SFI that you don’t appreciate being fooled, using ForestEthics petition.

But just in case you don’t want to wait for them to clean up their act before you buy this year’s holiday cards, there are other options. The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) is a well-regarded certifier of wood products that's far more reliable than SFI. And of course, 100 percent post-consumer recycled is always 100 percent guilt free.

Photo credit: David Owen via Flickr

Follow Change.org's Environment page on Facebook and Twitter.

Margaret Swink writes about forests, climate and why saving rainforests is still just as sexy as you remember it from 1989.
PREVIOUS STORY:
NY Is Just One Stroke of the Pen From a Fracking Win
NEXT STORY:
Stopping the Water Grab in Nevada

COMMENTS (2)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.