EPA Lays The Smack Down With Greenhouse Gas Ruling

by Nikki Gloudeman · 2010-07-30 09:00:00 UTC
Topics:

Climate change denialists pounced last year when EPA officially ruled that greenhouse gases are a pollutant that threaten human health and the environment. But while many just made a stink, others petitioned (read: irrationally begged) the agency to reverse its decision.

Yesterday, EPA laid the smack down and rejected petitions from all 10 groups that filed.

Let's take a moment to examine this ragtag bunch of "silenced" dissenters. We may find some familiar names:

1) The Ohio Coal Association and Peabody Energy, the largest private-sector coal mining company in the world

2) Two dirty energy front groups. One is the Competitive Enterprise Institute, which has received funding from the charitable arm of Koch Industries, the nation's largest privately-held energy company; and the other is the Coalition for Responsible Regulation, a mysterious group with shadowly connections to Salvoy Chemicals, the leading producer of soda ash and hydrogen peroxide.

3) The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, famous friend to Big Business, foe to the environment, and, more and more, a bunch of Tea Party wingnuts.

4) The State of Texas and The Commonwealth of Virginia. Leading the charge is none other than climate change enemy #1 Ken Cuccinelli

The swift ruling was coupled with a decisive response from EPA administrator Lisa Jackson, who said, "The endangerment finding is based on years of science from the U.S. and around the world. These petitions—based as they are on selectively edited, out-of-context data and a manufactured controversy—provide no evidence to undermine our determination."

To which climate change enemy #2, Senator James Inhofe, huffed, "EPA chose ... to dismiss legitimate concerns about data quality, transparency, and billions of dollars of taxpayer-funded science as products of 'conspiracies.' Rather, such ad hominem attacks are products of closed-mindedness and ultimately harm EPA's reputation and legal standing in court."

Considering the overwhelming scientific evidence that supports the fact that manmade climate change is a grave global challenge (which led many to greet EPA's initial declaration with a "What took you so long?") and the self-interest of many of the accusers, it's no big shock that EPA has batted down the petitions. But their move has luckily come at a particularly valuable time in the movement.

That's because when EPA declared greenhouse gases were a pollutant, it was more than just a symbolic move; it paved the way for the agency to set forceful guidelines on carbon dioxide emissions from coal-burning power plants, oil and gas refineries and other big emissions sources, since they could now be covered under the Clean Air Act.

Now that the Senate's climate change bill, which would have led to more sweeping regulations in this vein, has died, it's essential that the muscle we do have to curb global warming remains flexed. More than that, it's pivotal that, even despite the Senate, our government is making clear it's not going to lie down and do nothing about climate change.

Sorry, Big Oil, Ken Cuccinelli, and Texas: It isn't.

Photo credit: Nicolas Espinosa/Wikimedia Commons

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Nikki Gloudeman is a senior fellow at Mother Jones magazine where she writes about the environment and other topics.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Massey Slaps Anti-Coal Activists With Legal Mess
NEXT STORY:
Stopping the Water Grab in Nevada

COMMENTS (23)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.