European Union Proposes Animal Testing Loophole

by Stephanie Feldstein · 2009-11-23 03:25:00 UTC
Topics:

The European Union Parliament plans to downgrade animal welfare in their latest update to a decades-old directive. The version that's in place demands that alternatives to animal testing are used whenever there are "reasonably and practically available" options. The new proposals allow researchers to continue using animal methods until alternatives are "recognised by Community legislation." That bureaucratic technicality can take years. The new animal testing directive would also let procedures like basic medical research completely slip under the radar.

It's particularly disappointing that the EU, which can be so progressive on issues like chemicals policy, would regress on its animal testing stance. It's especially surprising since the EU ban on animal testing in cosmetics went into effect earlier this year. In reverting back to old research methods, the proposed revisions fail to promote humane ethics and scientific innovation. Why are they abandoning common sense?

For the same reason that they voted against scaling back primate experiments six months ago. It's the usual suspect: industry lobbyists. One politician actually resigned earlier this year due to "excessive industry interference" on these laws.

I noticed that The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) applauds this proposal on their website, despite the UK's leading organization against animal medical research, the Dr. Hadwen Trust, coming out against it. Have they not read the fine print?

The European Union member states are voting any day now. Join the Virtual March to call for stronger protections in the animal testing directive.

Stephanie Feldstein is a Change.org Editor who has been part of the animal welfare and rescue community for over a decade, and most recently worked for an environmental organization.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Is Your Pet Green?
NEXT STORY:
Petitions Delivered Around the World for Release of Indonesian Circus Dolphins

COMMENTS (1)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.