Facebook and Google Ditch The Festivities for Charity

by Nathaniel Whittemore · 2009-12-21 22:52:00 UTC

Both Facebook and Google have opted to do something a little bit different this holiday season.

TechCrunch reported today about how, instead of getting some new Google-themed schwag or getting an invite to an open bar holiday party, users of Google's AdSense and AdWords project got a link to an announcement that they would be donating $20 million to a host of organizations include social innovators like Ushahidi.

Similarly, Facebook sent out a message today to some folks saying that, instead of a holiday party, they were donating $25 to DonorsChoose.org - the site that allows donors to fund a specific project in a specific classroom. The email Facebook sent out gave recipients the chance to redeem a "token" and select the project they wanted to support.

These seem to me to be the polar opposite of the cause marketing fiasco I've been writing about with the Chase Community Giving challenge. Whereas Chase's basic approach was to extract as many Facebook Fans as they could for a preset cost, and to get as much press and buzz as they could about it, both FB and Google have done this more quietly. While that doesn't mean they're not interested in positive marketing, it does bias one to think their motivations may be more in line with the organizations they're supporting.

Oh, and by the way, for some context. Google's annual operating income is about $6.6 billion a year, vs. JP Morgan Chase's $37 billion, yet it gave away 4x as much as the entire Chase Community Giving campaign, with barely a drop of the fanfair.

Nathaniel Whittemore is the founder of Assetmap. Previously he was the founding director of the Northwestern University Center for Global Engagement.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Help My Dog Heal!: The Anatomy of A Social Media Fundraiser
NEXT STORY:
Facing Forward: The End of the Social Entrepreneurship Blog on Change.org

COMMENTS (1)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.