Farm Policy Needs Long View

by Natasha Chart · 2009-01-09 09:55:00 UTC
Topics:

Wendell Berry and Wes Jackson, leading lights of the sustainable food movement, wrote an op-ed the other day, hoping to inspire A 50 Year Farm Bill. They discuss the shameful waste and abuse of our soil's health, and sum up the urgency this way ...

... For 50 or 60 years, we have let ourselves believe that as long as we have money we will have food. That is a mistake. If we continue our offenses against the land and the labor by which we are fed, the food supply will decline, and we will have a problem far more complex than the failure of our paper economy. The government will bring forth no food by providing hundreds of billons of dollars to the agribusiness corporations. ...

Their suggested solution lies partly in efforts, already underway, to breed perennial grain crops through traditional plant breeding. Perennial crops, because they don't have to be replanted every year, leave the soil covered the majority of the time. Turning more land to grazing pasture and more diverse crop rotations would also help, but the principle remains - we can't let our soil continue to wash and blow away because we simply can't replace it.

Not that you have to take my word for it. A 2006 Cornell study of erosion worldwide indicated that the United States is losing topsoil 10 times faster than it can be replaced naturally, and that the world is losing 37,000 square miles of cropland to erosion every year. That's a lot of soil loss to make up for even if we were trying, which we aren't.

Shorter soil situation: More people + less crop land = bad, bad news.

"Only when the last tree has died and the last river has been poisoned and the last fish has been caught, only then will you discover you cannot eat money" - Cree proverb

(Photo credit: Flat6 on Flickr)

PREVIOUS STORY:
Rice Prices Look To Head Up
NEXT STORY:
Join the Social Media Day of Action to Rid Girl Scout Cookies of Forest-Destroying Palm Oil

COMMENTS (6)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.