Florida Bill Promises More Sprawl & Less Public Investment
...developers would no longer have to pay if local roads could not handle the impact of their projects [in communities with at least 1,000 people per square mile]. The law would also let individual municipalities or counties designate areas for large-scale development — an outlet mall, a sprawling subdivision — without being subject to regional planning boards that currently analyze how such plans would affect communities nearby.
It's an interesting article on urban planning conflict, I know a topic that's as near and dear to my readers as it is to me. :)
But the end of the article just kills me. The GOP Rep. who proposed this bill, Dorothy Hukill, says:
“We are dependent on tourism and construction,” Ms. Hukill said, “whether we like it or not.”
No!!! It is this kind of resignation that just destroys us in the long term, leading to a race to the bottom in terms of environmental devastation, worker exploitation, privatization, and inequality. We can shift how our economy works; it just takes EFFORT and DETERMINATION and IDEAS and a commitment to LONG-TERM CHANGE. We need not be resigned to "low-road" economic development - and I say "low-road" because FLA is a Right-to-Work state. Oy, we have got our work cut out for us, my fellow Change agents!
(Photo of development "just to the west of Guana River State Park" in Florida by Jon Worth.)









COMMENTS (0)