Focus on the Family Brings Abstinence Agenda to China

by Sarah Menkedick · 2010-09-18 16:19:00 UTC

In 2006, officials in Yunnan Province, China, stumbled across Focus On The Family patriarch James Dobson's radio commentaries, and liked what they heard about parenting, gender issues, family values, and, most significantly, pre-marital sex. On a 2007 trip to the United States, they made a point of stopping by Colorado Springs to compliment Dobson and give their respects.

The meeting, an indicator of the increasing surreality of international politics and the bizarre overlap between the extreme right-wing and the Communism-as-dictatorship "left wing," led to the exportation of Focus on the Family's abstinence-only programs to China. It took two years to translate the program and two years to push it through all the appropriate bureaucratic channels (the Communist Party insisted on no religious or political references, which, as Slate writer Tracy Clark-Flory remarked, is deeply ironic seeing as the organization is essentially an emphatically Christian lobbyist for the far right-wing).

And in the previous week, abstinence-only programs kicked off in China, with their condoms-don't-work scare tactics and their antiquated clunkers like, "If you want to celebrate our love, bring me roses at 7 p.m. and let's go to dinner." The latter actually sounds a lot like some of the more guileless, rosy-cheeked propaganda from the height of Chinese Communist rule, when couples were forced to pledge their love wholly to the state, and even small gestures of affection could be seen as indications of insurrection (see Jung Chang's Wild Swans for more on this).

It seems more of an indicator than ever of the panicked retrograde motion of China's leaders that they're forced to turn to an American evangelical organization to sustain the last vestiges of restrictive, state-controlled Communist "morality." There is an overpowering and inevitable sense of change in China, and for as much as the Chinese government would like to believe that this change is purely physical and economic, it is also affecting social, political and personal values. One example: more and more Chinese teenagers are having premarital sex. More are questioning traditional Chinese values (some of which were challenged under Communism, others of which were simply given different names).

And what is the response of the government? To turn to new, but very familiar tactics: values campaigns that reinforce traditional gender roles and female submissiveness, and blind denial of any indicators that such submissiveness and roles might be changing.

Photo credit: Mugs99

Sarah Menkedick is a freelance writer currently based in Oaxaca, Mexico. She has spent the last five years teaching, writing and traveling on five continents. She regularly writes about women's rights.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Glenn Beck Compares Abortion to Slavery (Yes, Really)
NEXT STORY:
Fox News' Trotta Still Doesn't Get It: I Want Her Rape Apologism Off the Air

COMMENTS (8)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.