Follow Sex Ed Curriculum, Go to Jail?

by Rose Garrett · 2010-04-09 10:19:00 UTC

On March 11, the state of Wisconsin instituted a new sex education law that requires schools to include information on birth control and sexually transmitted diseases in the state's comprehensive sex ed curriculum. Many might say this is a good move for a state with rates of teen pregnancy and STDs well above the national average. But not Juneau County District Attorney Scott Southworth.

In a letter sent to five school districts, Southworth said that the legislation “promotes the sexual assault of children,” exposes teachers to criminal liability, and forces schools to condone “controversial sexual behavior.” A requirement that instruction not promote bias against pupils of any sexual orientation or against sexually active pupils would “inject an intense amount of unnecessary politics” into classrooms, said Southworth, and conflict with religious belief.

Just how does teaching about contraception lead to the sexual assault of children? Southworth claims that learning about contraception leads to sexual activity (an age-old argument that doesn’t hold much water) and points out that “young adults engaging in sexual intercourse with teenage children” is illegal. It doesn’t take a legal scholar to tell us that statutory rape is against the law, but how exactly does one make the leap from learning that condoms can prevent pregnancy and STDs to rampant sexual assault?

Southworth offers this metaphor: “It is akin to teaching students about alcohol abuse, and then instructing them on how to make mixed alcoholic drinks.” Actually, it’s more like giving kids safety tips about not driving drunk, but who’s counting?

Southworth may have dispensed with logic once he passed the LSAT, but there is some concern that his claims could intimidate or frighten schools into inaction. However, his argument that teachers who adhere to the new curriculum could be charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor is pretty baseless; teaching the curriculum is, after all, in accordance with state law. Southworth might well consider heading back to school for a refresher. Who knows, he might learn something new.

Photo credit: Meddygarnet

Rose Garrett is Assistant Editor at Education.com. She lives in San Francisco.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Tell Congress to Save Literacy Group Reading is Fundamental
NEXT STORY:
Student loans got you down? Start a petition.

COMMENTS (6)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.