For Prisons, the Recession is a Missed Opportunity

by Colin Asher · 2010-04-26 15:49:00 UTC

When the recession began in 2008, I thought, "We might finally start letting some folks out of custody if we just can't afford to keep them there anymore." After all, it costs $70 billion a year to lock up the nearly two and a half million people the U.S. keeps behind bars. States shoulder $52 billion of that cost. Maybe, I thought, the recession would force the states to lower spending by reducing their prison populations.

Alas, I was wrong. Incarceration budgets have pushed several states toward bankruptcy, but few have taken the sensible option of reducing costs by releasing prisoners.

New Jersey just became another case in point. On Thursday, it was reported that the Garden State needs to cut $75 million from its incarceration budget. In order to do so, the state is trying everything from outfitting inmates with sneakers instead of boots to double-bunking and cutting staff. Educational programming is expected to suffer. New Jersey will not, however, reduce its prison population through early release. That decision, unfortunately, places them solidly in the mainstream among prison systems.

For example, when North Carolina was forced to cut $74 from their incarceration budget in August, they chose to do so without releasing any prisoners — despite the fact that the state's prison population has more than doubled since the mid-1980's.

In May of last year, Idaho tried to save $4.7 million by cutting 38 staff positions from the Department of Corrections. They reduced substance abuse and mental health programming, but they declined to cut their prison population. Michigan made largely the same choice. They closed prisons, moved prisoners and cut staff. But they did not release anyone.

In time, we'll look back on the recession as an opportunity lost. We could have cut incarceration costs for good by releasing non-violent offenders and offering more prisoners early release. Instead, we're cutting rehabilitative programming and making conditions less humane, setting ourselves up for more spending down the road. The services available before may have been inadequate, but without them now, prisoners are going to be that much more likely to return to prison after they're released. And I think we can safely say that men double-bunked in gymnasiums for years on end won't emerge from prison better for their experience.

Photo Credit: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Colin Asher is a former social worker and award-winning freelance writer whose work has appeared in the Boston Globe and the San Francisco Chronicle Magazine, among many others.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Tell Congress: Stop Allowing Criminals to Buy Guns
NEXT STORY:
Make the Call! Stop the Torture of Special Needs Children in Massachusetts

COMMENTS (9)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.