From Founder to Funder: New Seed Stage VC Launches

by Nathaniel Whittemore · 2009-11-10 13:01:00 UTC
Topics:

The pressure on venture capital firms for big exits is tremendous. Union Squares Venture principle Fred Wilson wrote about "The Venture Capital Math Problem," in the end hoping for a return to a scenario that involves smaller funds and more focus. This week, the Founder Collective is launching, putting this entrpereneur-centric perspective into practice.

Founded by active entrepreneurs, the Founder Collective is a $40 million fund based out of NYC and Cambridge, MA that will invest in seed stage ventures. To use their words, "a person or two and an idea is our favorite stage."

From their website, it seems like they want to create a fund that focuses heavily on mentorship and advising and that works to align the incentives of funders with founders. Indeed, most of the people contributing money to the fund are active founders themselves, like Hunch CEO Chris Dixon.

On his blog, Dixon writes that the group things of themselves as "peer-to-peer" venture capital, and sees its ethos in groups like Y Combinator. Among the five characteristics they list about themselves, they include "trying to be respectful," which is pretty unusual, and gives me a good vibe for the group.

Interestingly, they are going to focus on ideas coming out of the East Coast, which they see as poised for a startup renaissance. As a founder who anticipates one day being a funder, I'll definitely be watching this group to see how they shake this game up.

Photo: Founder Collective co-founder Chris Dixon.

Nathaniel Whittemore is the founder of Assetmap. Previously he was the founding director of the Northwestern University Center for Global Engagement.
PREVIOUS STORY:
The Days of Asshole Leadership Are Numbered
NEXT STORY:
Facing Forward: The End of the Social Entrepreneurship Blog on Change.org

COMMENTS (1)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.