From Sri Lanka to Darfur: A Tale of Two IDP Camps

by Michelle . · 2009-03-22 17:44:00 UTC

There's something about withholding food, water, and medical assistance from conflict-weary civilians --- not to mention committing a litany of unspeakable violent atrocities against them --- that can make a government rather unpopular.

Take Sri Lanka, for example:

Being uprooted, pushed around, and subjected to a laundry list of violent crimes throughout 25 years of civil war has done little to curry favor for the government among the country's ethnic Tamil population. As the Sri Lankan government continues its push to decimate the rebel Tamil Tigers once and for all, it may be sowing the seeds for its future discord: The violence and displacement experienced by the minority Tamils is breeding deeper and deeper resentment, while military success appears to be entrenching the chauvinism of the hard-line members Sinhalese majority currently in power.

Prognosis: No peaceful and stable democracy anytime soon.

And now consider Darfur:

Kalma camp, to be exact, home to 88,000 internally displaced persons (IDPs). In what appears to be a horribly misguided protest, the camp's civilian leadership is now refusing humanitarian assistance until the 13 expelled foreign aid agencies are allowed back into the region. The LA Times reports that aid from the Sudanese government and civilian charities are the main targets, but that assistance from UN and Western organizations has been refused as well.

The camp leadership is also apparently threatening to organize a hunger strike, which seems to be a foregone conclusion, on account of the refusal of food to the camp's residents. (Wonder how they feel about it?) If it's not misguided, then it's definitely an act of severe desperation:

"We want the international [aid groups] back," said Ali Abdel Khaman Tahir, the chief sheik at Kalma, speaking by telephone because the government is refusing to allow journalists in the camp, which is on the edge of Nyala, the capital of Southern Darfur province.

"If we allow them to distribute the food, then the government will be able to say to the world that everything is OK in Kalma," said Mubarak Shafi, a camp activist. "We want all the other problems solved first."

I can't help but wonder, though, if the Kalma camp leaders aren't just playing right into the government's hands, rather than teaching them some sort of lesson. If the government is keen to see the IDP camps disband, as has been the subject of recent speculation, won't this stunt help hasten such a plot along? Just sayin'.

The moral of the story is...

People don't like being abused, and tend to dislike their abusers as well. If you're a violent dictator, it might behoove you to stop and think about how your current show of military prowess might cause problems for you later on down the road.

Though I have a feeling that, if you are violent dictator, you plan to meet future challenges with similar trigger-happy zeal.

[Photo from AP: New arrivals at the Zamzam IDP Camp, North Darfur.]

Michelle . has been involved in various activist endeavors, including the Teach Against Genocide pilot campaigns.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Genocide over breakfast: Parade's "World's Worst Dictators"
NEXT STORY:
Campaign about Apple Factories in China Gains Wide and Diverse Support

COMMENTS (1)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.