Gay Marriage Impedes So-Called Messiah Glenn Beck's "Honorable" Mission

Glenn Beck's "Restoring Honor" rally in Washington, D.C. this weekend hopes to achieve two goals: "reclaim" the civil rights movement for the Tea Party set, and make him divine king of the nation's conservative set. He will fail on both fronts.

Regarding the civil rights angle: Beck and his followers can believe what they will, but their restrictive, exclusionary politics come nowhere near the progressive ideals set forth by civil rights movements, whether they be black, Latino, gay or otherwise. What was that phrase, so popular during the 2008 election: "Pig in lipstick?" Yeah, that's it.

As for Beck, Holy King of the Conservatives? He's riding high now, sure, but his lofty goal seems like a pipe dream. And we gays can take at least part of the credit.

The Fox News host shocked and awed the right wing earlier this month, when he admitted to Bill O'Reilly that he doesn't believe marriage equality should be considered a political issue. "Do you believe gay marriage is a threat to the country in any way," asked O'Reilly, to which Beck replied, "A threat to the country? No, I don't." Beck took a far more libertarian view of the matter than many had anticipated: "America, your country is burning down. I don’t think marriage, that the government actually has anything to do with what is a religious right." Social conservatives disagree.

Peter LaBarbera from the virulently anti-gay group Americans for "Truth" recently sent out a scathing missive in which he claimed Beck — and others, like Ann Coulter and Elisabeth Hasselbeck — had "caved in" to the gays, and put the country in jeopardy. "What confounds me are the 'conserv-a-libs' who so readily ditch five millennia of biblically-informed truth for the latest sexual/social fad," screeched Barber. "The libertarians appear to be winning the day on this issue, which is especially galling because the homosexualist agenda is a statist and anti-liberty agenda if there ever was one."

Beck may see no place for the marriage debate in his ideological mission, but that doesn't mean other seemingly natural allies don't: the Family Research Council, so long a cornerstone in the heterosexist conservative world, just released yet another statement urging members to fight the recent Proposition 8 ruling in California, where Judge Vaughn Walker's "poorly-developed ruling reflect[ed] his prejudice towards both religion and marriage."

It's no secret that the Tea Party and social conservatives have been facing a split: as economic issues dominate the national dialogue, groups like FRC are trying to reframe their moralistic debates in monetary terms. Sadly for them, they're not gaining much traction, and clearly prominent Tea Party leaders like Beck aren't on board with their obsolete worldview.

Even Beck's cohorts in the "Restoring Honor" rally aren't on board: his much lauded speaker, Dr. Alveda King, niece to MLK, has made it her mission to end gay rights, for she believes marriage equality would lead to "genocide." She's obviously not as eloquent as her late, great uncle.

GOP leader Ken Blackwell recently lamented that a GOP embrace of gay marriage would be a "disaster" that would split the party in two. Apparently it's not just the Republicans proper who are facing a homosexual schism. And, in terms of advancing equality, that's not a disaster: that's a blessing.

United the conservatives stand, divided they fall, and the United States can resume its eternal march toward fairness and achieving the liberal democracy for which so many have dreamed.

Photo credit: HA! Designs' Flickr.

Andrew Belonsky is a journalist living in New York City.
PREVIOUS STORY:
The Presbyterian Church Punishes Gay-Friendly Minister
NEXT STORY:
Bullied high schooler convinces MPAA to change ‘Bully’ rating to “PG-13”

COMMENTS (41)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.