Guerrilla Artists Take Over Billboards to Defeat San Francisco's Sit-Lie Ordinance

On Tuesday, residents of San Francisco will go to the polls to vote on the Sit-Lie Ordinance (Proposition L). If passed, it will be illegal to sit or lie on a city sidewalk between the hours of 7 a.m. and 11 p.m.

We argue that, if passed, this ordinance could potentially criminalize a person just for being homeless as the unhoused often become the target of such laws. Taxpayer dollars could be better spent creating and providing more affordable housing, supportive housing and services to assist these vulnerable individuals. With very few options, homeless people often have no other choice than to be on the streets and sidewalks. Outlawing them will only move them, not make them any less homeless. Stop the Sit-Lie Ordinance in San Francisco!

Meet some allies fighting for the fall of Prop L: the Sit/Lie Posse, a group of artists who have done some guerrilla activism and taken over billboard and bus stop ads with their own artwork to urge voters to say no to Prop L. The ads can be found throughout the city, including where there is strong backing of the proposition, around City Hall, the Haight-Ashbury district and others.

Officials in San Francisco are looking into the ads since they were put up illegally. The anonymous ads weren't paid for and they cover up other paid ads. The Sit/Lie Posse asserts they are artists who have liberated the ad spaces. Their spokesperson, Jim Rawley, said in a press release that "Prop. L ignores due process and criminalizes people based on appearance. If you look like you're homeless, you can be arrested while tourists and the wealthy get a free pass with first class treatment."

(In an interesting side note, San Francisco Chronicle writer Heather Knight points out that Jim Rawley is also the name of a Grapes of Wrath character who ran the Weedpatch camp and embraced the migrant Joad family. Coincidence?)

The voters of San Francisco will make their final decision regarding Proposition L this Tuesday. This is clearly a controversial piece of legislation with very strong opinions on both sides. We continue to argue the point that Proposition L is potentially dangerous to the already vulnerable homeless population within San Francisco. Homeless individuals do not need more ambiguous laws that are often unfairly leveled against them; they need more supportive services and housing options to assist them in moving from the sidewalk to a home.

Photo credit: Sit/Lie Posse

Rich Lombino & Elizabeth Lombino are an attorney/social work student and a social worker, respectively, working to end homelessness.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Jimmy Mack Tells it Like it Is: Rent Is Too Damn High
NEXT STORY:
Is the NCAA Putting Student Athletes at Risk?

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.