Guy Kawasaki's Interview With David Bornstein

by Nathaniel Whittemore · 2009-02-04 07:02:00 UTC

Global X interviewing author David Bornstein

Watching people discover social entrepreneurship on Twitter is one of the best ways to get a sense of how the language of the field is permeating. I'll often see tweets about content that was created years ago, but just got someone hooked. A number of people yesterday retweeted a link from @e180 about an interview that serial entrepreneur, author, and tech evangelist Guy Kawasaki did with "How to Change the World" author David Bornstein.

I particularly love the section where Bornstein discusses jobs and happiness:

Question: How can social entrepreneurs attract talent when there aren't high salaries and options?

Answer: By offering people employment opportunities that align with their talents, interests, and values. By inspiring them with a vision of changing the world, of being part of something bigger than themselves. We have to think about an assumption behind this question-namely the notion that people seek to maximize how much money they make. Certainly, we all care about making money. But choices that people make every day-becoming teachers, having children, giving money to charity-indicate that we are complex creatures motivated by many different things.

We are also at an interesting point in America's history. With all our wealth and freedom of choice, we seem to be obsessed with finding happiness. Everyday it seems another book is published focusing on how we can make ourselves happy. Most Americans today are phenomenally wealthy compared to their grandparents, yet many studies show we are no happier, and we actually may be less so. At the very top of the list of things that make people feel happy and fulfilled are doing work that you find challenging and deeply meaningful with colleagues whom you respect and care for. Social entrepreneurship offers this.
Question: Is this why many prominent business people move into social entrepreneurship?

Answer: Business people are moving into social entrepreneurship for the same reasons that so many other people across society are moving into this field: They see new opportunities to solve problems in creative ways; as individuals, they have far more power to understand and address problems at scale than in the past; they see enormous needs to solve problems that aren't being addressed by traditional institutions, whether businesses, governments or nonprofits; they have lived through what may be described as the "failure of success"-the extraordinary accumulation of wealth and possessions over the past fifty years that has left people feeling dissatisfied and often empty.

When Bill Gates announced that he would be stepping down from Microsoft to run his foundation, he made it clear that he was not retiring, but rather "reordering" his priorities. Why? It was through his research trips in the developing world that he came face to face with people suffering and dying-and he couldn't shake it. He saw that he could be more valuable to the world helping to develop AIDS or malaria vaccines, or expanding access to health care systems, than helping to create more software tools, as valuable as those tools may be. Lots of people are coming to similar conclusions. It is like a global awakening.

There's a lot more great stuff in there, and its well worth a read. In general, Guy's blog is a must read.

Nathaniel Whittemore is the founder of Assetmap. Previously he was the founding director of the Northwestern University Center for Global Engagement.
PREVIOUS STORY:
Build.kiva.org: Kiva Microloan API
NEXT STORY:
Facing Forward: The End of the Social Entrepreneurship Blog on Change.org

COMMENTS (5)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.