Has One Laptop Per Child Been A Terrible Failure?

The dream of the One Laptop Per Child Program (OLPC) may be over. Change.org alumni Alanna Shaikh explains how the program was too expensive, and writes of the constant changes made to laptop operating system. In the U.S. order fulfillment has been especially problematic and its effect on learning in the developing world may have been minimal. She points to a great piece by Timothy Ogden who finds "there appear to be cheaper, more effective ways to improve education in developing nations."
Ogden notes studies that indicate computing may hurt learning and that simply delivering deworming medication can significantly improve school attendance for a cheap price. An expert backs up his claims, saying "if deworming follows the pattern we saw in the U.S ... we could see a 30 percent increase in lifetime earnings." Sounds a lot better than what a costly computer can achieve, right? Michael Kleiman has been making a documentary about his experience with OLPC and in coming weeks he'll present a personal perspective on the successes of the scheme.
[Photo credit: OLPC]







COMMENTS (3)