Helping the Poor Quit Smoking

In Massachusetts, smoking among low-income residents has fallen 26%, thanks to a state-funded program that pays for smoking cessation treatment. It's a funny coincidence that I came across this article this morning; just last night at the convenience store I noticed that a pack of cigarettes is about $7.50.  That is almost as much as the hourly minimum wage ($8).  That's a very hefty expense on such modest wages. Poor Americans

“...are truly the individuals who are harmed the most by tobacco in America today,’’ said Dr. Michael Fiore, director of the University of Wisconsin-Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention. “The proportion of family income that Medicaid recipients have to devote to purchasing this drug they’re addicted to, tobacco, is higher than for virtually any other group in our society.’’

Low-income Americans have higher smoking rates in general; one of the reasons is the expense of quitting. So funding smoking cessation for poorer Americans who want to quit is a very equitable policy. When the state decided to run the program, which provides both treatment and counseling and uses intensive promotion to recruit participants, they expected 5-10% participation of eligible residents (those who receive state-subsidized health insurance). Instead, 40% have enrolled.

With such successful enrollment and cessation rates, the program has earned national attention, and advocates are encouraging Congress to require cessation coverage in healthcare reform. There are clear, long-term, societal benefits for everyone, not just the poor: their lower admissions to the E/R for asthma and other related health problems is just one widespread cost saving that results. According to Valerie Bassett of the Massachusetts Public Health Association, "...when we’re looking at cost savings, it’s one of the easiest ones to realize.’’

(Photo by matze_ott)

PREVIOUS STORY:
Wikipedia Founder Creates Site for Homeless
NEXT STORY:
Sallie Mae Blinks!

COMMENTS (11)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.