Hillary Clinton: Global Economic Crisis Fuels Trafficking

by Amanda Kloer · 2009-06-16 10:59:00 UTC
Topics:

I said it here months ago, but Secretary of State Hillary Clinton confirmed today that the global economic crisis is fueling human trafficking around the world.  Her statement was made as part of the release of the 2009 State Department Trafficking in Persons Report.

Economic pressure, especially in the global economic crisis, makes more people susceptible to the false promises of traffickers. Trafficking has a broad global impact as well. It weakens legitimate economies, fuels violence, threatens public health and safety, shatters families, and shreds the social fabric that is necessary for progress.

Clinton, as usual, was spot on with her analysis, but let's take a minute to break down the "why" of her statement.

Part 1: Economic pressure makes people more susceptible to traffickers. The obvious translation of this statement is that as workers who were already living in poverty get poorer, they become desperate and willing to take on riskier and more dangerous work. True, but it also means families whose children were in school may be pulling them out of school to put them to work in factories with exploitative conditions.  It means women in abusive relationships may be less likely to leave their partners because fewer jobs are available.  It means trafficking victims in prostitution may find that as the nightly customers decrease, the beatings for failing to make their quota for their pimp increase.  In short, economic pressure can both drag people into trafficking, and make the trafficking worse for those already suffering.

Part 2. Trafficking weakens legitimate economies. There are thousands of unemployed construction workers in this country now looking for legitimate work, work which is being performed by victims of human trafficking.  And every time a trafficking victim is forced to work in construction, the trafficker is impeding both job growth and the economic impact those workers would have if they were employed.  Ending trafficking would mean more paying, legitimate work for workers in industries from agriculture to service to construction.

Part 3. Trafficking fuels violence, public health issues, and social problems. We have a large enough battle ahead of us to get the economy back on track, so why on earth should we have to use resources to address all the social ills that trafficking brings?  Rehabilitating trafficking victims, reuniting families, and prosecuting traffickers is expensive.  Prevention efforts, on the other hand, not only save lives, they help offset some of these costs.  Recognizing that this economy fuels trafficking is the first step to focusing more energy on prevention.

In short, ending human trafficking makes a lot of economic sense, given the current crisis we are facing.  I'm glad that Clinton sees the effects of our economic crisis on trafficking victims and those at risk, and is willing to address it head on.

Image from supereco.com

Amanda Kloer is a Change.org Editor and has been a full-time abolitionist in several capacities for seven years. Follow her on Twitter @endhumantraffic
PREVIOUS STORY:
Red Light Special: Magazine Bead Necklace is Recycled and Fair
NEXT STORY:
Today is National Human Trafficking Awareness Day, how are you going to take action?

COMMENTS (1)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.