House GOP Document Traced Back to Coal Majors

by Emily Gertz · 2009-06-19 19:24:00 UTC
Topics:

Grist's Kate Sheppard has stuck with the story she broke yesterday, regarding an "anti–climate bill document created by coal lobby." It's being circulated by the House GOP as part of an effort to derail the Waxman-Markey clean energy and climate bill.

Map illustrationThe document, a map of the nation, purports to "highlight how the Democrats’ National Energy Tax will make it more expensive for rural Americans to fertilize the crops, put fuel in the tractor and food on the table."

By examining the document's digital properties, Grist has been able to determine a chain of creation and editing extending back to 1998, intersecting with the National Mining Association, a trade group; Peabody Coal, the world's biggest coal producer; and another industry behemoth named Arch Coal. (Arch Coal has denied any involvement in the document.)

NMA doesn't deny involvement in the doc; in fact, as Kate discovered, it's got the same map up on its own web site. But "the fine print at the bottom of the National Mining Association’s version of the PowerPoint document," unlike the map circulating on Capitol Hill, "includes an extra page of data. At the bottom of that page is a note that says the document does not accurately reflect the Waxman-Markey legislation as it currently stands." [Emphasis mine.]

It's certainly not rare that industry associations feed talking points to legislators willing to go to bed with them bat for them.

And this isn't the first time that House GOP legislators and their allies have used ginned-up numbers in opposition the Waxman-Markey bill -- as one-time GOP influencer Newt Gingrich tried to do at an April committee hearing on the bill.

What seems unique this time around is that the ultimate provenance of the talking points wasn't scrubbed away.

PREVIOUS STORY:
Fatalistic Friday: Reality bites. Chu bites back.
NEXT STORY:
Stopping the Water Grab in Nevada

COMMENTS (2)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.