How Top Countries Test: Lessons for Arne Duncan from Linda Darling-Hammond

by Clay Burell · 2009-05-07 10:52:00 UTC

In one of my recent criticisms of the much-hyped McKinsey report, I promised to follow up with the following presentation by Linda Darling-Hammond, of the Stanford School Re-design Network, that compares and contrasts the assessment approaches of the world's top-ranked education countries to those of the United States. The presentation is from a conference sponsored by the Forum for Education and Democracy, which describes Dr. Darling-Hammond's presentation with this blurb:

“What we have thought of as fairly rare in [the USA] is quite common in most of the high-achieving countries internationally,” Linda Darling-Hammond began. Beginning with a list of 21st century skills, Darling-Hammond contrasted US tests - which require recall of a simple fact or ask students for a one-sentence explanation - with exams abroad that include designing science experiments, refining computer programs and explaining the reasoning behind solutions for complex problems. “[In many nations,] there’s a teaching and learning system, that operates to provide rich curriculum and strong outcomes,” Darling-Hammond said. “They are what assure that the higher-order skills are actually taught and practiced.”

It's 20 minutes long, but well worth the watch (the discussion of science assessments around 15:00 is especially noteworthy).

For those of you who don't know, Darling-Hammond led Obama's education transition team, and was the top choice for Secretary of Education among many progressive education reformists. Instead of getting this education professor to lead our reforms, though, Obama chose instead Chicago's Arne Duncan, who never taught in a classroom and has no background or advanced degrees in education. It's hard not to regret that choice - and not to wonder why we hear almost nothing about Darling-Hammond's ideas from Duncan - while watching the presentation.

Anyway, enjoy:
.

PREVIOUS STORY:
Why Wal-Mart Schools are a Frightening Idea
NEXT STORY:
Student loans got you down? Start a petition.

COMMENTS (5)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.