Humanitarian Access; Not So Much

by Michael Bear · 2009-08-13 08:09:00 UTC
Topics:

Humanitarian access is a rather straightforward concept - really nothing more than the ability of aid agencies to reach those most in need.  Which, needless to say, is a good thing.

Unless, of course, you're a somewhat deranged dictator (hello, Bobby Mugabe), or a run-of-the-mill repressive regime (say Sudan, or Ethiopia), or a bunch of sociopathic insurgents (here's looking at you, Taliban and Al Shabaab).

To be fair, it's rather easy to believe that life-saving aid is, well, optional when you're not the one relying on such aid.  No one has ever accused dictators or insurgents of an over-abundance of empathy.  As the man once said: sois mon frère ou je te tue.

So, without further ado:

- In the not-so-surprising category: "Zimbabwe: Mugabe threatens to ban NGOs again".

- Speaking of repressive regimes, Sudan not only expelled and disbanded sixteen NGOs in March, but also happily extorted money along the way.

- Now, in an impressive effort to one-up its neighbor, Ethiopia just suspended the work of forty-two (mostly local) NGOs.  [N.B. The article mentions MSF, but in fact MSF is still operating in the country.]

- Meanwhile, Pakistan has made a valiant effort to claim the title of "country with the least humanitarian access" - IRIN reports that aid work in the country is "hard hit by insecurity", as agencies scale back operations in both the Northwest Frontier Province and Balochistan.

- Yet anything Pakistan can do, Afghanistan can do better - according to Voice of America, sixty percent of Afghanistan is insecure for aid workers.

- Of course, nothing quite beats Somalia, where last year more aid workers were killed than anywhere else.  Just recently, Action Against Hunger announced that it might cease operations in Somalia following the kidnapping and release of four of its staff.

- Then again, a lack of funds is just as debilitating as any crazed armed group.  The World Food Program has announced that it might have to cut back its humanitarian air service in Chad, Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea if it doesn't raise more funds.  The humanitarian air service is often the only way for aid workers to reach remote locations in war-torn (or semi-almost-war-torn) countries.

[Photo of Taliban from open.salon.com/blog/ohdannyboy]

Michael Bear
PREVIOUS STORY:
The Blogosphere on Hillary Clinton in Congo
NEXT STORY:
Campaign about Apple Factories in China Gains Wide and Diverse Support

COMMENTS (0)

    Comment Policy

    · All fields are required to comment.

    [X]

    Comments on Change.org are meant for further exploration and evaluation of the campaign on Change.org. To that end, we welcome constructive comments. However, we reserve the right to delete comments which, as determined solely in our discretion: (1) are offensive, abusive, or off-topic; (2) include content solely intended to personally attack the campaign creator, (3) are designed to subvert or hijack comment threads rather than contribute to them; and/or (4) violate our terms of service and/or privacy policy. Repeat offenders may be permanently removed from the site at our discretion. Please also be advised that: (A) we do not actively curate and/or monitor in any manner whatsoever the comments made on the Change.org platform, and (B) the creator of each campaign on Change.org may remove any comment at her/his/its discretion.